| [ Web Proxy ] |
| Viewing: https://stripe.com/en-hk/guides/how-to-evaluate-billing-software | [Back] [Original] |
Stripe Billing powers any pricing model from recurring to tiered and hybrid to help manage customers your way.
Learn moreChoosing a billing vendor is one of the most consequential infrastructure decisions a growing business can make. Get it right, and you'll have a system that scales with your pricing model, handles global compliance automatically and keeps revenue flowing reliably. Get it wrong, and you're looking at months of rework and revenue leakage.
Stripe Billing is included as a reference point throughout treat it as a concrete example of what a mature billing platform looks like in production.
This template gives you a structured, end-to-end way to run a billing vendor request for proposal (RFP) from administrative ground rules to detailed requirements, commercials and evaluation scoring. It's built around the capabilities that matter most for subscription businesses in 2026: usage-based and multi-attribute pricing, payment recovery that's powered by machine learning (ML), real-time revenue analytics, global tax compliance and emerging requirements such as agentic commerce and embedded financial products.
This RFP template isn't meant to be used as a rigid form. It's more like a guide you can (and should) customise to your specific needs. Each section comes with prompts to help you write questions that get you useful answers, not just marketing blurbs. Fill in the blanks with specifics about your project, push for detail where it matters most, and cut anything that doesn't apply. When it's used well, this RFP template can save you time, reveal suitable vendors and better inform your final decision.
Table of contents
The goal of the cover page is to tell vendors exactly what they're looking at and whom to talk to. Include the RFP title, your company's name, a short confidentiality notice and contact details for the person who manages the process. Dates matter, too. List the issue date and due date right up front so nobody can claim they missed them. Keep the cover page concise. It should be about orientation, not showing off what your design team can do.
Here's what to include in this section:
You might want to design your own branded RFP document. In that case, the outlines in each section can provide a strong foundation. Below, we've also added sample copy you can use.
|
RFP manager |
[Full name] |
|
Title |
[Title] |
|
|
[email@company.com] |
|
Phone |
[###-###-####] |
Key dates
|
Issue date |
[MM/DD/YYYY] |
|
Questions due |
[MM/DD/YYYY] |
|
Response due |
[MM/DD/YYYY, time zone] |
|
Evaluation period |
[MM/DD/YYYYMM/DD/YYYY] |
|
Final selection |
[MM/DD/YYYY] |
Submission format
All responses must be submitted electronically via email in PDF format. Pricing and scoring templates (provided separately in Excel) must be attached in their original formats.
File naming convention
[Vendor name][Project name]RFPResponse[Date].pdf
Purpose of this RFP
[Your company] is seeking a billing partner capable of supporting secure, multicurrency transactions, integrating easily with internal systems via modern APIs and delivering high reliability, proactive fraud detection and data transparency across regions.
This document outlines the requirements, evaluation criteria and process for submitting proposals.
Short confidentiality notice
This RFP contains confidential and proprietary information belonging to [your company]. It's provided solely for the purpose of preparing a response. Distribution beyond those directly involved in preparing a proposal is prohibited. By accepting this RFP, the recipient agrees to protect this information with at least the same degree of care they apply to protect their own confidential information.
This section sets the ground rules. Before vendors invest time in a response, they need to know how the process works, what's expected and what the timeline looks like. Ambiguity here creates problems later so be precise.
Here's what to include:
Here's an example of how this could look.
All information in this RFP is confidential and intended solely to enable the vendor to prepare a response. Vendors must not disclose, reproduce or distribute this RFP or any portion of it to third parties without prior written consent from [your company]. If the vendor includes proprietary information in its proposal, that information should be clearly labelled. [Your company] will treat it accordingly.
This RFP isn't an offer to contract. [Your company] is under no obligation to award a contract or reimburse costs incurred in preparing a response. Vendors are solely responsible for their own expenses throughout this process.
|
Milestone |
Target date |
|---|---|
|
RFP issued |
Q3 2026 |
|
Vendor acknowledgment due |
[+3 business days] |
|
Vendor questions due |
[+2 weeks] |
|
Q&A distributed to all vendors |
[+3 weeks] |
|
Proposal submission deadline |
Q4 2026 |
|
Evaluation period |
Q4 2026 |
|
Short list notifications |
Q4 2026 |
|
Vendor demonstrations |
Q4 2026Q1 2027 |
|
Final selection |
Q1 2026 |
|
Target go-live |
Q1 2026 |
Each vendor must include the following materials in its submission.
|
Document |
Format |
Required? |
|---|---|---|
|
Executive summary |
|
Yes |
|
Section E requirements response |
|
Yes |
|
Completed pricing template |
Excel |
Yes |
|
Company profile and financial summary |
|
Yes |
|
Three or more client references |
|
Yes |
|
Compliance certifications (e.g. PCI DSS v4.0, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001) |
|
Yes |
|
Case studies or client outcome summaries |
|
Strongly recommended |
|
API documentation excerpt or developer portal link |
PDF or URL |
Recommended |
[Your company] will evaluate proposals on billing functionality, technical architecture, global compliance coverage, payment recovery performance, revenue reporting depth, implementation approach and vendor stability. Vendors that demonstrate ML-driven optimisation, real-time analytics, strong API performance and readiness for agentic and AI-initiated billing workflows will be prioritised.
Vendors must complete and return the acknowledgment below within three business days of receiving this RFP.
We acknowledge receipt of the RFP titled "[RFP name]" and confirm our intention to submit / not to submit a response.
Company name: ________________________
Authorised representative: ________________________
Title: ________________________
Date: ________
A vague overview produces generic proposals. Give vendors the context they need to respond intelligently, such as your business model, pricing complexity, the markets you serve and the specific problems you're trying to solve. You could optionally include additional details to customise the overview, including headquarters and key markets, approximate annual revenue or billing volume and internal teams involved (e.g. Finance, Engineering, Compliance, RevOps, Customer Success).
Here's an example of how this could look.
[Your company] is a [global/regional] technology company that operates in [insert markets], serving [insert customer type] with [insert product or service description]. Our billing operations span [X] markets and support [describe pricing models such as usage-based, subscription and hybrid plans].
This RFP exists to identify a billing platform that supports the next phase of our growth. Our current setup [describe the gap (e.g. cannot handle usage-based pricing, lacks global tax compliance, doesn't integrate with our ERP system, cannot support AI-initiated subscription changes)].
Our ideal partner will enable:
Core deliverables:
Optional deliverables:
Define what's excluded so vendors don't price or assume responsibility for it. Here are some examples:
If you don't specify how you want proposals formatted, you'll receive everything from five-page slide decks to 200-page PDFs. This section standardises what you receive so you can compare vendors side by side.
Here's an example of how this could look.
Each proposal must follow this structure:
Submissions that deviate significantly or omit required elements might be deemed non-compliant.
Executive summary
Solution overview
Implementation plan
Security and compliance
API and developer capabilities
Questions must be submitted in writing by [question deadline] to [RFP manager's email]. Answers will be distributed to all participants simultaneously. No informal discussions with other [your company] employees are permitted during the process.
Proposals must remain valid for 90 days from the submission deadline unless extended by written mutual agreement.
[Your company] reserves the right to reject any proposal, request clarifications or enter parallel negotiations with one or more vendors. Participation doesn't constitute a commitment to purchase.
Transparency in scoring pushes vendors to respond with evidence rather than marketing copy. Every criterion below maps to a specific question in Section E so vendors who read this know exactly where to focus.
Here's an example of how this could look.
All proposals will be reviewed by a cross-functional team including Finance, Engineering, Compliance and RevOps. The evaluation runs in three stages:
|
Criterion |
Weight |
What we're evaluating |
|---|---|---|
|
Billing functionality and pricing model depth |
25% |
Breadth of pricing models, usage metering precision, entitlement management |
|
API performance and developer experience |
15% |
Latency benchmarks, uptime SLA, versioning policy, sandbox quality |
|
Payment recovery and authorisation performance |
15% |
ML-driven dunning management, network token support, retry intelligence, card updater |
|
Global compliance and tax automation |
15% |
Market coverage, automated tax calculation, invoice localisation, PCI DSS v4.0 |
|
Revenue reporting and recognition |
10% |
Real-time analytics, ASC 606 support, data warehouse connectivity |
|
Agentic and embedded capabilities |
5% |
Support for AI-initiated billing actions, embedded financial products |
|
Implementation and support |
5% |
Realistic timelines, SLAs, dedicated resources, support quality |
|
Commercials and vendor stability |
10% |
Pricing transparency, contract flexibility, financial health |
The above weights are adjustable depending on project priorities but must total 100%.
Short-listed vendors will demonstrate:
Vendors must provide temporary demo credentials valid for at least 10 business days after the demonstration.
[Your company] reserves the right to conduct clarification sessions, request best-and-final offers and negotiate with one or more vendors. No contract is binding until it's executed by both parties.
Evaluator notes remove before sending to vendors
This is the most important section. Require factual, evidence-backed responses. Any vendor worth short-listing can point to production metrics, published documentation and real client examples not just claimed capabilities. For each requirement, vendors must indicate one of these statuses: Standard (in production today), Configurable (requires setup), Custom (requires development) or N/A.
Here's an example of how this could look.
For sales teams
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
CRM integration that enables sales teams to create quotes based on your product catalogue and billing logic |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Quote-to-subscription and quote-to-invoice conversion without manual re-entry |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Quote amendment that updates an active subscription when a contract changes |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Support for complex quoting scenarios: instalment schedules, prepayments and scheduled usage increases |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Multicurrency quoting with localised pricing per plan and accurate FX handling |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
A checkout experience that loses customers at the payment step is a billing problem, not just a UX problem. Expect vendors to provide documented conversion lift data from production environments not estimated figures.
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
Subscription initiation across web, mobile (iOS and Android) and in-person channels |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Mobile-first checkout with native SDK support and fine-tuned UX for small screens |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Built-in checkout conversion optimisations (e.g. real-time card validation, address autocomplete, localisation) |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Saved payment credentials (e.g. Link or equivalent) that enable returning customers to check out faster without re-entering payment details |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Documented payment conversion uplift from saved credential and checkout optimisation features with production metrics provided |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Fraud detection logic that blocks illegitimate payments without raising false decline rates |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Secure payment method storage and reliable recurring charge execution at scale |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
Ability to embed billing capabilities (e.g. recurring payments, invoicing, subscription management) into your product for resale to your own customers |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Separate billing accounts or entities per end customer with consolidated reporting for the platform |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Support for custom pricing models per end-customer without platform-level engineering per tenant |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
Global compliance is a continuous operational requirement. Compliance standards change: PCI DSS v4.0 went into effect March 2024, and jurisdictions from India to Germany and Brazil impose specific billing obligations. Your vendor needs to track and implement these automatically, instead of waiting for you to ask.
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
3D Secure 2.0 (3DS2) support with dynamic exemption handling per PSD2 requirements (updated 2023) |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
PCI DSS v4.0 compliance (effective March 2024) with current certification level and most recent audit date specified |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
ACH support including microdeposit verification and instant verification via bank integration for US customers |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Mandate registration for SEPA Direct Debit (EU), preauthorised debit (Canada) and Bacs (UK) |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Mandate registration for the Reserve Bank of India with automated pre-debit notifications |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Data localisation compliance for transaction data in India |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Single-click subscription cancellation for German customers without requiring login (Kndigungsbutton regulation) |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Automatically updated, locally compliant invoice templates, including country-specific formats such as Brazil's Nota Fiscal |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
OFAC and sanctions screening on transactions |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
PSD2 exemption handling with SCA exemptions (e.g. low-value, business-initiated, trusted beneficiary) recognised and applied to reduce unnecessary friction |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
A billing platform that handles only flat-rate subscriptions is already limiting your go-to-market strategy. Usage-based and multi-attribute pricing are standard for SaaS and infrastructure businesses. Your vendor needs to support them natively, not through work-arounds.
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
Flat-rate, tiered, volume and graduated pricing models |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Usage-based billing with configurable aggregation (e.g. sum, max, last value, count of unique values) |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Multi-attribute pricing (e.g. a base seat fee plus metered usage overage) |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Good-better-best packaging with entitlement management for feature gating |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Discounts applied at the line item level in a configurable order |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Free trials with or without a required payment method |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Customer prepayment before a subscription starts |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Scheduled future subscription start dates |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Backdating subscriptions to charge for past service periods |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Installment billing for multiperiod contracts |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
One-time invoices for custom deals alongside recurring subscriptions |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Direct customer payment on an invoice without a stored payment method |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
The operational value of a billing platform scales directly with what it automates. Manual intervention in billing workflows is a source of errors, delays and avoidable costs.
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
Automated sales tax and VAT calculation on subscriptions and invoices, updated in real time as rates change |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Proration logic for upgrades, downgrades and mid-cycle cancellations |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Entitlement provisioning (i.e. the billing system acts as source of truth for which customers can access which features and when) |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Automated contract renewal notifications with configurable lead times |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Bulk subscription changes for mass plan migrations or pricing updates |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Hierarchical account management for parent and child account structures |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Automated receipt generation compliant with local tax requirements |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Automated invoice delivery with configurable triggers and retry logic |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
Internal dashboard that enables non-technical teams (e.g. Finance, RevOps, Customer Success) to create and manage subscriptions, invoices and customer records without engineering support |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Customer self-service portal for subscription management, invoice access and payment method updates |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
In-app or embedded notification support for subscription events and payment alerts |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Multilanguage support for customer-facing communications, dunning messages and invoices |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
Payment method coverage and authorisation rates are direct revenue drivers, not secondary concerns. A 1% improvement in authorisation rate on a recurring billing portfolio is real money. The difference between vendors often comes down to network scale: ML-based retry logic works well only when the model is trained on enough signals to know which parameters to adjust for a given issuer, card type and failure code. Stripe's Adaptive Acceptance, for example, draws on data across millions of businesses to refine retry attempts in real time. That's the benchmark to hold other vendors against. Require documented authorisation rate benchmarks from production environments and ask vendors to explain specifically how they achieve them.
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
Integration with a payment provider or preferred payment gateway |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Support for cards, digital wallets (Apple Pay, Google Pay), bank debits, bank transfers and bank redirects |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Network Token support: automatic token provisioning and lifecycle management to improve authorisation rates on recurring transactions |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Adaptive Acceptance or equivalent ML-based retry logic that re-attempts declined transactions using optimised parameters provide documented recovery rate lift |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Global payment processing with support for [insert required currencies and markets] |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Multi-currency pricing per subscription plan so customers pay in their local currency |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Intelligent payment routing to maximise authorisation rates by issuer, card type and market |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
Local acquiring in key markets to improve authorisation rates and reduce interchange costs |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Level II and Level III data transmission for eligible card transactions to reduce interchange costs |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
ZIP code and AVS data passed to issuers to improve authorisation rates |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Lower-cost payment method options (e.g. bank debits, digital wallets) |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
FX fee optimisation with transparent exchange rate sourcing for cross-border transactions |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
Failed payments are the single largest driver of involuntary churn for subscription businesses. How a vendor handles payment recovery is a core competency that deserves the same scrutiny as pricing model support. Stripe's Smart Retries, included with Stripe Billing at no additional cost, uses ML to identify the optimal retry timing per customer, instead of running a fixed schedule. Network tokens minimise declines further by updating card credentials automatically when underlying details change, without requiring any customer action. When you're evaluating other vendors on this dimension, use Stripe's recovery performance as your baseline: require production recovery rate data, ask how the retry logic is trained and treat vague answers as a signal.
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
Automatic card updater for lost, expired, stolen and damaged cards, with network coverage (e.g. Visa, Mastercard, Amex, Discover) specified |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Network token lifecycle management (i.e. automatic token updates when underlying card details change, reducing declines without customer action) |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
ML-powered dunning engine with dynamic retry scheduling based on individual customer behaviour, issuer patterns and failure reason codes |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Predictive retry logic where the system identifies optimal charge timing per customer to maximise recovery probability, with documented recovery rate from production provided |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Adaptive retry scheduling that adjusts timing based on issuer response signals, not a static calendar |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Configurable dunning sequences by customer segment, subscription value, payment method or failure reason |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Automated email and SMS notifications for payment failures, expiring cards and upcoming renewals with customisable templates |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Multilanguage dunning support for global customer bases |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Rate for documented involuntary churn reduction from existing deployments using real figures, not estimates |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
Cancellation flow with configurable survey questions to capture churn reasons at the point of cancellation |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Churn deflection logic with personalised offers (e.g. pauses, discounts, plan downgrades) presented to cancelling customers based on their profiles |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Predictive churn scoring to flag at-risk customers before they cancel |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
AI-driven, personalised retention recommendations based on usage patterns and subscription histories |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
CRM or support system integration for high-touch churn intervention on high-value accounts |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
AI agents and automated workflows are increasingly initiating commercial transactions. They can schedule subscription changes, respond to customer requests and manage billing events without direct human action. Billing infrastructure built in 2026 needs to account for this. Vendors who haven't thought about agentic billing will create integration bottlenecks as you scale AI-driven customer experiences.
Agentic commerce refers to AI agents or automated systems that initiate, modify or cancel subscriptions and billing actions on behalf of customers. This requires APIs and authentication patterns that are purpose-built for machine-to-machine interactions, not adaptations of human-facing flows.
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
API design that supports authenticated machine-to-machine billing actions (e.g. subscription creation, modification, cancellation) initiated by AI agents or automated systems |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Granular OAuth scopes or API key permissions that allow agents to act within defined boundaries without elevated privileges |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Audit trail and logging for all agent-initiated billing actions with attribution and time stamps |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Rate limiting and abuse controls that distinguish between high-volume automated workflows and anomalous activity |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Webhooks and event streams suitable for agent consumption (e.g. reliable delivery, retry logic, low-latency event propagation) |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Sandbox environment that supports automated integration testing of agentic billing workflows |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
Billing infrastructure that connects to adjacent financial products (e.g. card issuing, treasury, lending) creates compounding value for platforms and marketplaces. If you offer or plan to offer financial products alongside your core product, your billing vendor's ability to integrate with those products matters.
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
Integration with card issuing capabilities (e.g. corporate cards, virtual cards) that can be billed through the same platform |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Treasury or embedded banking integration with the ability to hold, move and reconcile funds within the billing system |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Support for BNPL or financing options at checkout or on invoices |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Consolidated reporting across billing, issuing and treasury activity in a single dashboard |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Compliance and regulatory coverage for embedded financial products in markets where you operate |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
Billing data is revenue data. Your vendor should give your Finance, RevOps and leadership teams real-time visibility into what's happening across your subscriber base, not CSV exports you reconcile manually after the fact.
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
Real-time dashboards that cover MRR, ARR, new subscriptions, active subscriptions, churn and NRR |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Trial conversion tracking from trial start to paid conversion with cohort analysis |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Recovery efficacy reporting with dunning outcomes by retry attempt, payment method and failure reason |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Cancellation deflection reporting with retention rate and which offers converted |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Customisable dashboard widgets and configurable report views |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Direct SQL access to billing data or data export to Snowflake, BigQuery or Redshift |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
AI-driven revenue forecasting and growth projections based on subscription and usage trends |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
If your team is manually building revenue waterfall reports or reconciling billing data to your general ledger, that's a gap your next vendor should close. Compliance with ASC 606 and IFRS 15 should be built in, not appended after the fact.
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
Automated revenue recognition that's compliant with ASC 606 and IFRS 15, updated as standards develop |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Revenue waterfall charts and deferred revenue schedules generated automatically from billing data |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Accounting reports with balance sheets and income statements derived from billing data |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Customisable recognition logic for different product types, contract structures and multielement arrangements |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Accounts receivable tracking with visibility into outstanding, paid and overdue balances |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Refund, dispute, upgrade and downgrade tracking with revenue impact shown in reporting |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
ERP integration with NetSuite, QuickBooks, Xero and Sage and details as to whether it's certified or custom |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
CRM integration for sales contract recognition and reporting |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Consolidated reporting across multiple revenue sources and billing entities |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Audit trail and exportable reports suitable for external auditor review |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
Automated dispute alerts with transaction context and customer history shown immediately |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Integrated workflow for dispute evidence submission within the billing platform |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Dispute root cause analytics to identify patterns and reduce future chargeback rates |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Proactive fraud signal monitoring that flags suspicious billing patterns before disputes are filed |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
A billing platform you can't integrate reliably or that degrades under load is a serious liability. Evaluate API quality with the same rigor you apply to functional coverage. Ask for production performance data, not benchmarks from synthetic test environments.
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
Published API latency SLA with p50, p95 and p99 response time benchmarks from production (including p99 under 300ms as target for core billing operations) |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Uptime SLA of 99.9% minimum with historical uptime data for the past 12 months provided |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Public status page with real-time incident reporting and historical incident log |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Horizontal scalability where the platform handles billing volume peaks (e.g. end-of-month invoicing runs) without latency degradation |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Idempotency keys supported on all write operations to prevent duplicate charges |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Rate limiting with clear documentation of limits and a grace period or quota expansion process for high-volume workflows |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
RESTful API with comprehensive, versioned documentation and a changelog |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
SDKs available for primary development languages (Node.js, Python, Ruby, Java, Go and PHP) |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Webhook support with configurable retry logic, delivery monitoring and failure alerts |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Full sandbox environment with production parity for all billing flows, including usage metering, dunning management and revenue recognition |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Advance notice of at least 12 months for breaking API changes with deprecation policy in writing |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Postman collections or equivalent for rapid integration testing |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Developer portal with API reference, guides and in-browser request testing |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
Native CRM integrations with Salesforce and HubSpot |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Native ERP and accounting integrations with NetSuite, QuickBooks, Xero and Sage |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Data warehouse connectivity with Snowflake, BigQuery and Redshift |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Tax engine integrations with Avalara and Vertex or built-in global tax calculation |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Customer support platform integration with Zendesk, Intercom and Salesforce Service Cloud for billing queries and issue resolution |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
Compliance is a moving target. PCI DSS v4.0 went into effect March 2024 and introduced new requirements regarding authentication, monitoring and targeted risk analysis. GDPR enforcement has intensified since 2023, with regulators issuing record fines for data handling violations. Your vendor needs to stay current, not catch up.
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
PCI DSS v4.0 compliance (effective March 2024) with the certification level and most recent Qualified Security Assessor audit date specified |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
SOC 2 Type II certification with the most recent audit period and report date provided |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
ISO 27001 certification or equivalent information security management standard |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
GDPR-compliant data handling with configurable retention, deletion and portability controls |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
CCPA compliance for US customer data |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Data residency options for markets with localisation requirements (e.g. EU, India) |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Granular data privacy controls and per-market customisation of data handling |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Incident response plan with defined client notification timelines and contractual commitment specified |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
OFAC and sanctions screening on all transactions |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Advanced data privacy controls (e.g. field-level encryption, tokenisation of PII, role-based data access) |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
Requirement |
Status |
Vendor response / evidence |
|---|---|---|
|
Documented uptime SLA of 99.9% at minimum and historical performance data for the past 12 months |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Public status page with real-time incident reporting |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Confirmation of horizontal scalability with no degradation during batch invoicing runs or high-volume metering ingestion |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
Defined RTO and RPO for disaster recovery scenarios |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
|
|
ML or anomaly detection for early alerts on billing failures or unusual patterns |
Standard / Configurable / Custom / N/A |
I hereby certify that all responses are accurate as of the submission date and that capabilities marked Standard or Configurable are currently available in production environments. Claims not supported by documentation or a live demonstration will not be evaluated.
Authorised representative: ________________________
Title: ________________________
Date: ________
Evaluator notes remove before sending to vendors
If you're evaluating Stripe as your billing partner, here's how our platform maps to the requirements in Section E. We've grouped our capabilities by the areas where the underlying architecture decisions have the most impact on your business.
Subscription and pricing model flexibility
Stripe Billing supports more than 15 pricing models nativelyflat-rate, tiered, volume, graduated, and morewithout requiring custom engineering for each go-to-market motion. For usage-based billing, Metronome, a Stripe product, processes up to 100K events per second and handles metering across any attribute you define: API calls, computing, outcomes, seats, or custom dimensions. For businesses that run complex enterprise contracts, Metronome supports prepaid and postpaid commitments, midcycle amendments, and custom discounting. New pricing models can be launched with centralised rate cards, with updates pushed instantly across your subscriber base. For full documentation, see Stripe Billing and usage-based billing.
Payment recovery
Failed payments are the largest driver of involuntary churn for subscription businesses, and recovery performance is where billing platforms most visibly diverge. Stripe's Smart Retries uses ML to determine the optimal retry timing per customer drawing on signals across Stripe's network rather than run a static retry calendar. Network token support means that when a customer's underlying card details change, Stripe updates the token automatically, minimising declines without requiring any customer action. The automatic card updater covers Visa, Mastercard, Amex and Discover and runs in the background on every active subscription. Smart Retries and dunning management are included with Stripe Billing at no additional cost. For documentation on revenue recovery configuration, see Stripe Docs.
Global tax and compliance
Stripe Tax calculates sales tax, VAT and GST across more than 100 countries and 600 product categories, updating in real time as rates change, with a documented historical uptime of 99.999%. Coverage spans B2B, B2C, subscription and marketplace models so you can expand into new markets without rebuilding your tax logic each time. Tax collection can be switched on in a new jurisdiction in seconds from the Dashboard or with a single line of code and Stripe Tax integrates with filing partners to handle remittance where supported. For current jurisdiction coverage and compliance documentation, see Stripe Tax.
Revenue reporting and recognition
Stripe Revenue Recognition automates accrual accounting in line with ASC 606 and IFRS 15, generating revenue waterfall charts, deferred revenue schedules and journal entries directly from your billing data with no manual reconciliation required. Every recognised and deferred revenue amount is traceable back to the underlying customer and invoice, making audits substantially faster. For teams that need custom SQL access to their billing data, Stripe Sigma provides an interactive query environment in the Dashboard. Stripe Data Pipeline syncs your Stripe data to Snowflake, BigQuery or Redshift for warehouse-native analytics, with Sigma access included. For details, see Stripe Revenue Recognition and Stripe Data Pipeline.
API and developer experience
Stripe's RESTful API ships with server-side SDKs for Node.js, Python, Ruby, Java, Go, PHP and .NET, plus mobile SDKs for iOS and Android. The API is versioned by release date, with deprecation notices preannounced in the SDK README files and changelog, and an extended support window of one to two years per language version after end of life. Stripe's sandbox environment now called Sandboxes provides full production parity for all billing flows including usage metering, dunning management and revenue recognition, with no test mode restrictions on query volume. Stripe's 90-day average uptime runs at five nines. For API reference, SDK documentation and sandbox access, see Stripe Docs.
Agentic commerce
Stripe has been building for agentic billing since before most vendors named the category. The Agentic Commerce Protocol (ACP), co-developed with OpenAI and live in ChatGPT's Instant Checkout, provides an open standard for AI agents to initiate and complete transactions programmatically. Stripe's Shared Payment Tokens let agents act on behalf of buyers using scoped, limited-time credentials that never expose underlying card details with full audit logging and webhook events on every action. For subscription businesses, Stripe Billing's API design supports machine-to-machine workflows directly: agents can create, modify and cancel subscriptions using granular restricted API keys with permissions scoped to exactly what each agent needs. The Stripe Agent Toolkit and Stripe MCP server give developers prebuilt integrations with frameworks such as LangChain, OpenAI's Agents SDK and CrewAI. For documentation, see Stripe agentic commerce and Stripe MCP.
To see any of these capabilities in a live environment, contact Stripe sales to arrange a sandbox demonstration, or visit Stripe Docs for full technical documentation.
The best billing platform can fail if the implementation doesn't go smoothly. This section investigates whether the vendor has the methodology, resources and support model to get you live without disrupting your billing operations and keep you running reliably afterward.
Here's an example of how this could look.
Vendors must describe:
Vendors should provide:
Vendors should describe:
Vendors must specify:
Vendors should explain:
Describe how you use platform analytics, ML-driven insight and proactive monitoring to improve billing performance over time. Provide specific examples of measurable improvements delivered to existing clients, such as increased recovery rate, better authorisation rate, and reduction in billing-related support tickets.
I certify that all implementation and support details provided here are accurate as of the submission date and reflect current production practices and service levels.
Authorised representative: ________________________
Title: ________________________
Date: ________
Evaluator notes remove before sending to vendors
Billing platform pricing can be opaque. This section standardises how vendors present costs so you can compare them properly. If you don't require itemized disclosure up front, you'll discover bundled fees and minimum commitments only after the contract is signed.
Here's an example of how this could look.
Vendors must provide:
|
Component |
Unit |
Unit price |
Volume assumption |
Monthly total (est.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Platform or base fee |
Month |
|||
|
Subscription management |
Per active subscription |
|||
|
Invoice generation |
Per invoice |
|||
|
Usage metering |
Per event / per API call |
|||
|
Tax calculation |
Per calculation |
|||
|
Payment recovery / dunning management |
Per retry / per recovery |
|||
|
Network Token provisioning |
Per token / per update |
|||
|
Revenue recognition module |
Month |
|||
|
Customer portal |
Included / per seat |
|||
|
Agentic API access (if separately priced) |
Per call / per month |
|||
|
Implementation and onboarding |
One-off |
|||
|
Ongoing support tier |
Month |
|||
|
Add-ons (list individually) |
Provide a sensitivity analysis that shows how pricing changes at the following volumes.
|
Volume tier |
Estimated monthly cost |
|---|---|
|
[Your baseline] |
|
|
2 baseline |
|
|
5 baseline |
|
|
10 baseline |
List all commercial assumptions that underpin your pricing, including volume minimums, exclusivity requirements, specific payment methods and geographic scope. Unstated assumptions discovered after contract execution might be treated as a material misrepresentation.
I certify that the pricing and commercial information in this proposal is complete and accurate as of the submission date and reflects all applicable discounts, fees and terms.
Authorised representative: ________________________
Date: ________
Evaluator notes remove before sending to vendors
A billing platform is a long-term infrastructure partner. You need to know the company behind the product its financial health, engineering depth and trajectory not just whether today's feature list looks right.
Here's an example of how this could look.
Provide a two- to three-paragraph summary that covers your history, mission and market position. Emphasise your experience in supporting enterprise-scale, multimarket billing operations and your track record for maintaining compliance as regulations develop.
Include brief bios (three to five lines) for key leaders involved in this engagement. Describe their technical or compliance expertise and any relevant certifications.
Provide audited financial statements or equivalent evidence of solvency. Private companies should provide CFO letters that certify liquidity. Describe your funding structure, if applicable.
|
Certification / framework |
Status and most recent audit date |
|
PCI DSS v4.0 (effective March 2024) |
|
|
SOC 2 Type II |
|
|
ISO 27001 |
|
|
GDPR |
|
|
CCPA |
|
|
ASC 606 / IFRS 15 readiness |
|
|
Country-specific certifications |
Provide a high-level road map that covers upcoming releases over the next 12 18 months. Highlight planned investments in ML-powered features, agentic commerce support, global compliance coverage and API performance. Explain how customer feedback influences your prioritisation.
List key technology and channel partnerships relevant to this engagement. Describe how these enhance reliability, compliance coverage or integration depth.
Describe practices that reduce environmental impact (e.g. digital receipts by default, paperless invoicing, insight into payment method environmental footprint). Explain how sustainability is embedded in your platform operations.
I certify that all information in Section H is accurate as of the submission date and that [vendor] has the financial, technical and operational capacity to perform the described services.
Authorised representative: ________________________
Date: ________
References from comparable customers tell you more than any demo can. Prioritise references that look like your business with similar pricing complexity, scale and regulatory footprint. Generic references from different verticals or much smaller businesses don't predict your experience.
Here's an example of how this could look.
Vendors must provide a minimum of three client references that meet these criteria:
|
Company name |
Contact name and title |
Industry |
Market(s) |
Tenure |
Key use case |
For each reference, provide measurable outcomes such as payment recovery improvement, authorisation rate change, deployment timeline and revenue recognition automation achieved. Include client testimonials where available.
I confirm that each client has consented to serve as a reference and that all information provided is accurate.
Authorised representative: ________________________
Date: ________
Evaluator notes remove before sending to vendors
Attach as the first page of your response packet. Incomplete submissions might be excluded from evaluation.
|
Item |
Included? |
Notes |
|
Executive summary (three-page maximum) |
Yes No |
|
|
Section E requirements response |
Yes No |
|
|
Completed pricing template (Excel) |
Yes No |
|
|
Vendor profile and financial summary |
Yes No |
|
|
Three or more client references |
Yes No |
|
|
PCI DSS v4.0 certification documentation |
Yes No |
|
|
SOC 2 Type II report (most recent period) |
Yes No |
|
|
API latency and uptime documentation |
Yes No |
|
|
Case studies with measurable outcomes |
Yes No |
|
|
Signed vendor certification statements |
Yes No |
|
Term |
Definition |
|
ASC 606 |
Revenue recognition standard that governs when and how revenue from customer contracts is recognised in the US. IFRS 15 is the international equivalent. |
|
Dunning |
The process of communicating with customers to collect payment on failed or overdue invoices typically via automated email, SMS and payment retry logic. |
|
MRR / ARR |
Monthly and annual recurring revenue: the normalised recurring revenue from active subscriptions. These are the primary growth metrics for subscription businesses. |
|
NRR |
Net revenue retention: the percentage of recurring revenue retained from existing customers, including expansions, contractions and churn. |
|
Proration |
Calculation of partial-period charges or credits when a subscription changes during a billing cycle. |
|
Usage-based billing |
A pricing model where charges are determined by measured consumption rather than a fixed subscription fee. |
|
Entitlement management |
The system that determines which features a customer can access based on their subscription tier. |
|
Network Token |
A payment networkissued token that replaces a customer's card number for recurring transactions, improving authorisation rates when card details change. |
|
Adaptive Acceptance |
ML-based logic that retries declined transactions with refined parameters (e.g. different card data, routing or timing) to recover failed payments. |
|
3DS2 |
3D Secure 2: the authentication protocol for online card payments that reduces fraud and shifts liability to the issuer. It's required for many European transactions under PSD2. |
|
PCI DSS v4.0 |
The current Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard, effective March 2024, that governs storage, processing and transmission of cardholder data. |
|
Agentic commerce |
AI agents or automated systems that initiate, modify or cancel billing actions on behalf of customers, requiring machine-to-machine API design. |
|
Hierarchical accounts |
Account structures where a parent account contains multiple child accounts, each billed independently but consolidated for reporting. |
|
Local acquiring |
Processing card transactions through a payment acquirer in the same country as the customer, which typically improves authorisation rates and reduces interchange. |
|
Churn deflection |
Logic that intercepts a customer during the cancellation process and attempts to retain them through personalised offers, pauses or plan changes. |
For each vendor, calculate the following:
A condensed checklist for vendor self-assessment before submission.
I certify that this submission is complete and that all information provided is accurate to the best of my knowledge. I acknowledge that [your company] reserves the right to verify any claims made in this response.
Company name: ________________________
Authorised representative: ________________________
Title: ________________________
Signature: ________________________
Date: ________
Stripe Billing lets you bill and manage customers however you want from simple recurring billing to usage-based billing and sales-negotiated contracts. Start accepting recurring payments globally in minutes no code required or build a custom integration using the API.
Stripe Billing can help you:
Offer flexible pricing: Respond to user demand faster with flexible pricing models, including usage-based, tiered, flat-fee plus overage and more. Support for coupons, free trials, prorations and add-ons is built-in.
Expand globally: Increase conversion by offering customers' preferred payment methods. Stripe supports 125+ local payment methods and 130+ currencies.
Increase revenue and reduce churn: Improve revenue capture and reduce involuntary churn with Smart Retries and recovery workflow automations. Stripe recovery tools helped users recover over $8.2 billion in revenue in 2025.
Boost efficiency: Use Stripe's modular tax, revenue reporting and data tools to consolidate multiple revenue systems into one. Easily integrate with third-party software.
Learn more about Stripe Billing or get started today.
| Web Proxy Viewer | New URL | Original Page |