| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Currently custom_time is not being decoded correctly if the value has a zero in the microseconds field. This fixes the issue for custom_time as well as elsewhere by replacing _datetime_to_rfc3339 with _rfc3339_nanos_to_datetime. Fixes googleapis#363
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Thanks @tseaver. Did we miss a coverage check? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
The system test does cover the case that was failing before and ensures that we're correctly parsing the timestamp that GCS returns. I haven't dug into how this code is unit tested currently but I can look into it if you think it would help. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Currently custom_time is not being decoded correctly if the value has a zero in the microseconds field. This fixes the issue for custom_time as well as elsewhere by replacing _datetime_to_rfc3339 with _rfc3339_nanos_to_datetime. Fixes googleapis#363
Currently custom_time is not being decoded correctly if the value has a zero in the microseconds field. This fixes the issue for custom_time as well as elsewhere by replacing _datetime_to_rfc3339 with _rfc3339_nanos_to_datetime. Fixes googleapis#363
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Currently custom_time is not being decoded correctly if the value
has a zero in the microseconds field. This fixes the issue for
custom_time as well as elsewhere by replacing _datetime_to_rfc3339
with _rfc3339_nanos_to_datetime.
Fixes #363