Cause I don't want to disable scientific notation for numbers in the axis, which could be used without problem. I don't want to have a splinting of the values in 2 which is exactly what is supposed to be done by useOffset.
Do you think there is a problem in the method naming? or the documentation?
Activity
anntzer commented on Jan 15, 2020
That's not the offset (which refers to an added offset, not a multiplicative factor). You can turn off the factor with set_scientific(False).
vallsv commented on Jan 16, 2020
Thanks a lot.
It works, but it really sounds weird.
Cause I don't want to disable scientific notation for numbers in the axis, which could be used without problem. I don't want to have a splinting of the values in 2 which is exactly what is supposed to be done by useOffset.
Do you think there is a problem in the method naming? or the documentation?
anntzer commented on Jan 16, 2020
The name is unlikely to change, but you are welcome to propose improvements to the docs.
timhoffm commented on Jun 9, 2020
The above example does not show offset, but the scientific notation:
with useOffset

without useOffset (falling back to scientific) in case of the given numbers

Only if you disable both offset and scientific notation will you get the complete numbers at the labels for the data provided in the example.

The offset and the scientific label are quite similar, but offsets have a +/- sign while the scientific scaling factor has not.
vallsv commented on Jun 9, 2020
Then everything is working as expected.
But maybe an example with normal values on axis, and maybe your screenshot in the documentation could be really useful for other people.
Thanks a lot, i close this issue.