FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

BUG: plot_surface ignores lightsource when cmap/facecolors are not specified · Issue #8877 · matplotlib/matplotlib · GitHub

Repository navigation

BUG: plot_surface ignores lightsource when cmap/facecolors are not specified #8877

Open

Description

Three different, undocumented, cases that I think should be the same:

  1. plot_surface(..., shade=True, lightsource=..., cmap=..., facecolors="garbage") - uses LightSource.shade, which does some messy and unnecessary trig in LightSource.hillshade, using the orientation of the lightsource.

  2. plot_surface(..., shade=True, lightsource=..., cmap=...) - uses _shade_colors, which does a more sensible vector-based approach, but hard-codes a [-1, -1, 0.5] normal vector, rather than respecting the lightsource direction.

  3. plot_surface(..., shade=True, lightsource=..., facecolors="garbage") - as above

Regarding (2), I think that there is a typo in axes3d.py, and this change should be made:

         # Shade the data
-        if shade and cmap is not None and fcolors is not None:
+        if shade and cmap is not None and fcolors is None:
             fcolors = self._shade_colors_lightsource(Z, cmap, lightsource)

It seems dumb to only calculate face colors if the user already asked for different ones.

Regarding (3) - I think it would be useful to unify the shading into a normal-vector based approach, which I might try in a later patch

Activity

  1. changed the title [-]BUG: plot_surface ignores lightsource when cmap is not specified[/-] [+]BUG: plot_surface ignores lightsource when cmap/fcolors are not specified[/+] on Jul 14, 2017
  2. eric-wieser commented on Jul 14, 2017

    ContributorAuthor

    A demo:

    import numpy as np
    from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
    from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3D
    
    x, y = np.mgrid[-2:2:5j,-2:2:5j]
    z = x * y
    1. Simple case, showing ignored argument:

      fig, ax = plt.subplots(subplot_kw={"projection": "3d"})
      ax.plot_surface(x, y, z, cmap='viridis', shade=True, lightsource='Literally anything')

    2. Showing different shading passing in a unrelated argument. Also, cmap can't always be a string

      fig, ax = plt.subplots(subplot_kw={"projection": "3d"})
      ax.plot_surface(x, y, z, cmap='viridis', shade=True, facecolors="do it differently, ok?")
      # TypeError: String object not callable
      ax.plot_surface(x, y, z, cmap=plt.get_cmap('viridis'), shade=True,
          facecolors="do it differently, ok?")

    3. Showing lightsource calculations being wrong - overhead light should result in symmetric shading:

      from matplotlib.colors import LightSource
      fig, ax = plt.subplots(subplot_kw={"projection": "3d"})
      ax.plot_surface(x, y, z, cmap=plt.get_cmap('viridis'), shade=True,
         facecolors="do it differently, ok?", lightsource=LightSource(altdeg=90))

  3. changed the title [-]BUG: plot_surface ignores lightsource when cmap/fcolors are not specified[/-] [+]BUG: plot_surface ignores lightsource when cmap/facecolors are not specified[/+] on Jul 14, 2017
  4. eric-wieser commented on Sep 16, 2018

    ContributorAuthor

    This should probably remain open until some image-comparison tests are added to confirm it is fixed. I suspect the last issue still persists

  5. github-actions commented on Apr 14, 2023

    This issue has been marked "inactive" because it has been 365 days since the last comment. If this issue is still present in recent Matplotlib releases, or the feature request is still wanted, please leave a comment and this label will be removed. If there are no updates in another 30 days, this issue will be automatically closed, but you are free to re-open or create a new issue if needed. We value issue reports, and this procedure is meant to help us resurface and prioritize issues that have not been addressed yet, not make them disappear. Thanks for your help!

  6. added
    status: closed as inactiveIssues closed by the "Stale" Github Action. Please comment on any you think should still be open.
    on May 30, 2023
  7. added
    keepItems to be ignored by the “Stale” Github Action
    and removed
    status: inactiveMarked by the “Stale” Github Action
    status: closed as inactiveIssues closed by the "Stale" Github Action. Please comment on any you think should still be open.
    on May 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    keepItems to be ignored by the “Stale” Github Actiontopic: mplot3d

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions


      Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL