| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
1 parent bedc6e2 commit 25fb34c
2 files changed
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
@@ -1,61 +1,83 @@ | |||
| 1 | 1 | # Security Release Process | |
| 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | - The security release process covers the steps required to plan/implement | ||
| 4 | - a security release. | ||
| 3 | + The security release process covers the steps required to plan/implement a | ||
| 4 | + security release. This document is copied into the description of the Next | ||
| 5 | + Security Release, and used to track progess on the release. It contains | ||
| 6 | + ***TEXT LIKE THIS*** which will be replaced during the release process with | ||
| 7 | + the information described. | ||
| 5 | 8 | ||
| 6 | 9 | ## Planning | |
| 7 | 10 | ||
| 8 | 11 | * [ ] Open an issue in the private security repo titled `Next Security Release` | |
| 9 | - and add the planning checklist to the description. | ||
| 12 | + and add this planning checklist to the description. | ||
| 10 | 13 | ||
| 11 | - * [ ] Get agreement on the list of vulnerabilities to be addressed. | ||
| 14 | + * [ ] Get agreement on the list of vulnerabilities to be addressed: | ||
| 15 | + * ***LINKS TO VULNS...*** | ||
| 12 | 16 | ||
| 13 | - * [ ] Get agreement on the planned date for the releases. | ||
| 17 | + * [ ] Get agreement on the planned date for the release: ***RELEASE DATE*** | ||
| 14 | 18 | ||
| 15 | - * [ ] Once agreement on the list and date has been agreed, validate that all | ||
| 16 | - vulnerabilities have been assigned a CVE following the | ||
| 17 | - [cve_management_process](https://github.com/nodejs/security-wg/blob/master/processes/cve_management_process.md). | ||
| 19 | + * [ ] Validate that all vulnerabilities have been assigned a CVE. Upstream deps | ||
| 20 | + such as OpenSSL and NPM will have CVEs, issues reported on H1 may have CVEs, | ||
| 21 | + otherwise allocate them by following the | ||
| 22 | + [cve_management_process](https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/master/doc/guides/cve_management_process.md). | ||
| 18 | 23 | ||
| 19 | 24 | * [ ] Co-ordinate with the Release team members to line up one or more releasers | |
| 20 | - to do the releases on the agreed date. | ||
| 25 | + to do the releases on the agreed date. Releaser: ***NAME of RELEASER(S)*** | ||
| 21 | 26 | ||
| 22 | - * [ ] Prep for the pre-security announcement and final security announcement by | ||
| 23 | - getting agreement on drafts following the | ||
| 24 | - [security_announcement_process](https://github.com/nodejs/security-wg/blob/master/processes/security_annoucement_process.md). | ||
| 27 | + * [ ] Prep for the security announcements by getting agreement on drafts (use | ||
| 28 | + previously announced releases as the template): | ||
| 29 | + * pre-release: ***LINK TO COMMENT ON THIS ISSUE CONTAINING DRAFT*** | ||
| 30 | + * post-release: ***LINK TO COMMENT ON THIS ISSUE CONTAINING DRAFT*** | ||
| 25 | 31 | ||
| 26 | 32 | ## Announcement (one week in advance of the planned release) | |
| 27 | 33 | ||
| 28 | - * [ ] Ensure the pre-announce is sent out as outlined in the | ||
| 29 | - [security_announcement_process](https://github.com/nodejs/security-wg/blob/master/processes/security_annoucement_process.md). | ||
| 34 | + * Send pre-release announcement to | ||
| 35 | + https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/nodejs-sec. | ||
| 36 | + One of the existing managers can give access (Ben | ||
| 37 | + Noordhuis, Rod Vagg, Michael Dawson). ***LINK TO EMAIL*** | ||
| 38 | + | ||
| 39 | + * Post pre-release announcement in vulnerabilities section of Nodejs.org blog | ||
| 40 | + (https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/tree/master/locale/en/blog/vulnerability). | ||
| 41 | + Use last pre-release announcement as a template (it includes blog metadata | ||
| 42 | + such as updates to the banner on the Node.js website to indicate security | ||
| 43 | + releases are coming). Submit PR and leave 1 hour for review. After one hour | ||
| 44 | + even if no reviews, land anyway so that we don't have too big a gap between | ||
| 45 | + post to nodejs-sec and blog. Text was already reviewed in security repo so is | ||
| 46 | + unlikely to attract much additional comment. ***LINK TO BLOG PR AND POST*** | ||
| 30 | 47 | ||
| 31 | 48 | * [ ] Open an issue in the build working repository with a notification of the | |
| 32 | 49 | date for the security release. Use this issue to co-ordinate with the build | |
| 33 | 50 | team to ensure there will be coverage/availability of build team resources the | |
| 34 | 51 | day of the release. Those who volunteer from the build WG should be available | |
| 35 | - in node-build during the release in case they are needed by the individual | ||
| 36 | - doing the release. | ||
| 52 | + in node/build during the release in case they are needed by the individual | ||
| 53 | + doing the release. ***LINK TO BUILD ISSUE*** | ||
| 37 | 54 | ||
| 38 | - * [ ] Send an email to the docker official image | ||
| 39 | - [maintainers](https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/blob/master/MAINTAINERS) | ||
| 40 | - with an FYI that security releases will be going out on the agreed date. | ||
| 55 | + ## Release day | ||
| 41 | 56 | ||
| 42 | - * [ ] Open an issue in the [docker-node](https://github.com/nodejs/docker-node) | ||
| 43 | - repo and get one or more volunteers to be available to review the PR to update | ||
| 44 | - Node.js versions in the docker-node repo immediately after the release. | ||
| 57 | + * [ ] The releaser(s) run the release process to completion. | ||
| 45 | 58 | ||
| 46 | - * [ ] Call on the sec release volunteer(s) to start integrating the PRs, running | ||
| 47 | - the CI jobs, and generally prepping the release. | ||
| 59 | + * [ ] Send post-release announcement as a reply to the | ||
| 60 | + original message in https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/nodejs-sec | ||
| 61 | + ***LINK TO EMAIL*** | ||
| 48 | 62 | ||
| 49 | - ## Release day | ||
| 63 | + * [ ] Update the blog post in | ||
| 64 | + https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/tree/master/locale/en/blog/vulnerability | ||
| 65 | + with the information that releases are available and the full | ||
| 66 | + vulnerability details. Keep the original blog content at the | ||
| 67 | + bottom of the blog. Use this as an example: | ||
| 68 | + https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/blob/master/locale/en/blog/vulnerability/june-2016-security-releases.md. | ||
| 69 | + Make sure to update the date in the slug so that it will move to | ||
| 70 | + the top of the blog list, and not that it updates the | ||
| 71 | + banner on Node.js org to indicate the security release(s) are | ||
| 72 | + available. ***LINK TO PR*** | ||
| 50 | 73 | ||
| 51 | - * [ ] Co-ordinate with the Release team members and keep up to date on progress. | ||
| 52 | - Get an guesstimate of when releases may be ready and send an FYI to the docker | ||
| 53 | - official image | ||
| 54 | - [maintainers](https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/blob/master/MAINTAINERS). | ||
| 74 | + *Note*: If the release blog obviously points to the people having caused the | ||
| 75 | + issue (for example when explicitly mentioning reverting a commit), adding | ||
| 76 | + those people as a CC on the PR for the blog post to give them a heads up | ||
| 77 | + might be appropriate. | ||
| 55 | 78 | ||
| 56 | - * [ ] When the releases are promoted, ensure the final announce goes out as per | ||
| 57 | - the | ||
| 58 | - [security_announcement_process](https://github.com/nodejs/security-wg/blob/master/processes/security_annoucement_process.md). | ||
| 79 | + * [ ] Email foundation contact to tweet out nodejs-sec announcement from | ||
| 80 | + foundation twitter account. FIXME - who is this contact? | ||
| 59 | 81 | ||
| 60 | 82 | * [ ] Create a PR to update the Node.js version in the official docker images. | |
| 61 | 83 | * Checkout the docker-node repo. | |
@@ -81,19 +103,19 @@ a security release. | |||
| 81 | 103 | [maintainers](https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/blob/master/MAINTAINERS) | |
| 82 | 104 | indicating that the PR is open. | |
| 83 | 105 | ||
| 84 | - * [ ] Ensure that the announced CVEs are reported to Mitre as per the | ||
| 85 | - [cve_management_process](https://github.com/nodejs/security-wg/blob/master/processes/cve_management_process.md). | ||
| 86 | - | ||
| 87 | - * [ ] Ensure that the announced CVEs are updated in the cve-management | ||
| 88 | - repository as per the | ||
| 89 | - [cve_management_process](https://github.com/nodejs/security-wg/blob/master/processes/cve_management_process.md) | ||
| 90 | - so that they are listed under Announced. | ||
| 106 | + * [ ] If we allocated CVES: | ||
| 107 | + * [ ] Ensure that the announced CVEs are reported to Mitre as per the | ||
| 108 | + [cve_management_process](https://github.com/nodejs/security-wg/blob/master/processes/cve_management_process.md). | ||
| 109 | + * [ ] Ensure that the announced CVEs are updated in the cve-management | ||
| 110 | + repository as per the | ||
| 111 | + [cve_management_process](https://github.com/nodejs/security-wg/blob/master/processes/cve_management_process.md) | ||
| 112 | + so that they are listed under Announced. | ||
| 91 | 113 | ||
| 92 | 114 | * [ ] PR machine-readable JSON descriptions of the vulnerabilities to the | |
| 93 | 115 | [core](https://github.com/nodejs/security-wg/tree/master/vuln/core) | |
| 94 | - vulnerability DB. | ||
| 116 | + vulnerability DB. ***LINK TO PR*** | ||
| 95 | 117 | ||
| 96 | 118 | * [ ] Make sure the PRs for the vulnerabilities are closed. | |
| 97 | 119 | ||
| 98 | - * [ ] Ensure the issue in the private security repo for the release is closed | ||
| 120 | + * [ ] Ensure this issue in the private security repo for the release is closed | ||
| 99 | 121 | out. | |
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
0 commit comments