FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

deps: upgrade openssl sources to 1.0.2k · nodejs/node@6a0f1fa · GitHub

deps: upgrade openssl sources to 1.0.2k · nodejs/node@6a0f1fa · GitHub
Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Sign in
Sign up

Commit 6a0f1fa

Browse files
shigeki
authored and
Italo A. Casas
committed
deps: upgrade openssl sources to 1.0.2k
This replaces all sources of openssl-1.0.2k.tar.gz into deps/openssl/openssl PR-URL: #11021 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
1 parent 580a453 commit 6a0f1fa

181 files changed

Lines changed: 1122 additions & 39081 deletions

File tree

Some content is hidden

Large Commits have some content hidden by default. Use the searchbox below for content that may be hidden.

‎deps/openssl/openssl/CHANGES‎

Lines changed: 61 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2,6 +2,67 @@
22
OpenSSL CHANGES
33
_______________
44

5+
Changes between 1.0.2j and 1.0.2k [26 Jan 2017]
6+
7+
*) Truncated packet could crash via OOB read
8+
9+
If one side of an SSL/TLS path is running on a 32-bit host and a specific
10+
cipher is being used, then a truncated packet can cause that host to
11+
perform an out-of-bounds read, usually resulting in a crash.
12+
13+
This issue was reported to OpenSSL by Robert Święcki of Google.
14+
(CVE-2017-3731)
15+
[Andy Polyakov]
16+
17+
*) BN_mod_exp may produce incorrect results on x86_64
18+
19+
There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring
20+
procedure. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks
21+
against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to
22+
perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just
23+
feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to
24+
deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount
25+
of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and
26+
likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would
27+
additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target
28+
private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private
29+
key that is shared between multiple clients. For example this can occur by
30+
default in OpenSSL DHE based SSL/TLS ciphersuites. Note: This issue is very
31+
similar to CVE-2015-3193 but must be treated as a separate problem.
32+
33+
This issue was reported to OpenSSL by the OSS-Fuzz project.
34+
(CVE-2017-3732)
35+
[Andy Polyakov]
36+
37+
*) Montgomery multiplication may produce incorrect results
38+
39+
There is a carry propagating bug in the Broadwell-specific Montgomery
40+
multiplication procedure that handles input lengths divisible by, but
41+
longer than 256 bits. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA, DSA
42+
and DH private keys are impossible. This is because the subroutine in
43+
question is not used in operations with the private key itself and an input
44+
of the attacker's direct choice. Otherwise the bug can manifest itself as
45+
transient authentication and key negotiation failures or reproducible
46+
erroneous outcome of public-key operations with specially crafted input.
47+
Among EC algorithms only Brainpool P-512 curves are affected and one
48+
presumably can attack ECDH key negotiation. Impact was not analyzed in
49+
detail, because pre-requisites for attack are considered unlikely. Namely
50+
multiple clients have to choose the curve in question and the server has to
51+
share the private key among them, neither of which is default behaviour.
52+
Even then only clients that chose the curve will be affected.
53+
54+
This issue was publicly reported as transient failures and was not
55+
initially recognized as a security issue. Thanks to Richard Morgan for
56+
providing reproducible case.
57+
(CVE-2016-7055)
58+
[Andy Polyakov]
59+
60+
*) OpenSSL now fails if it receives an unrecognised record type in TLS1.0
61+
or TLS1.1. Previously this only happened in SSLv3 and TLS1.2. This is to
62+
prevent issues where no progress is being made and the peer continually
63+
sends unrecognised record types, using up resources processing them.
64+
[Matt Caswell]
65+
566
Changes between 1.0.2i and 1.0.2j [26 Sep 2016]
667

768
*) Missing CRL sanity check

‎deps/openssl/openssl/CONTRIBUTING‎

Lines changed: 17 additions & 38 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
1-
HOW TO CONTRIBUTE TO PATCHES OpenSSL
1+
HOW TO CONTRIBUTE PATCHES TO OpenSSL
22
------------------------------------
33

44
(Please visit https://www.openssl.org/community/getting-started.html for
@@ -11,34 +11,12 @@ OpenSSL community you might want to discuss it on the openssl-dev mailing
1111
list first. Someone may be already working on the same thing or there
1212
may be a good reason as to why that feature isn't implemented.
1313

14-
The best way to submit a patch is to make a pull request on GitHub.
15-
(It is not necessary to send mail to rt@openssl.org to open a ticket!)
16-
If you think the patch could use feedback from the community, please
17-
start a thread on openssl-dev.
14+
To submit a patch, make a pull request on GitHub. If you think the patch
15+
could use feedback from the community, please start a thread on openssl-dev
16+
to discuss it.
1817

19-
You can also submit patches by sending it as mail to rt@openssl.org.
20-
Please include the word "PATCH" and an explanation of what the patch
21-
does in the subject line. If you do this, our preferred format is "git
22-
format-patch" output. For example to provide a patch file containing the
23-
last commit in your local git repository use the following command:
24-
25-
% git format-patch --stdout HEAD^ >mydiffs.patch
26-
27-
Another method of creating an acceptable patch file without using git is as
28-
follows:
29-
30-
% cd openssl-work
31-
...make your changes...
32-
% ./Configure dist; make clean
33-
% cd ..
34-
% diff -ur openssl-orig openssl-work >mydiffs.patch
35-
36-
Note that pull requests are generally easier for the team, and community, to
37-
work with. Pull requests benefit from all of the standard GitHub features,
38-
including code review tools, simpler integration, and CI build support.
39-
40-
No matter how a patch is submitted, the following items will help make
41-
the acceptance and review process faster:
18+
Having addressed the following items before the PR will help make the
19+
acceptance and review process faster:
4220

4321
1. Anything other than trivial contributions will require a contributor
4422
licensing agreement, giving us permission to use your code. See
@@ -55,21 +33,22 @@ the acceptance and review process faster:
5533
in the file LICENSE in the source distribution or at
5634
https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html
5735

58-
3. Patches should be as current as possible. When using GitHub, please
59-
expect to have to rebase and update often. Note that we do not accept merge
60-
commits. You will be asked to remove them before a patch is considered
61-
acceptable.
36+
3. Patches should be as current as possible; expect to have to rebase
37+
often. We do not accept merge commits; You will be asked to remove
38+
them before a patch is considered acceptable.
6239

6340
4. Patches should follow our coding style (see
6441
https://www.openssl.org/policies/codingstyle.html) and compile without
6542
warnings. Where gcc or clang is availble you should use the
6643
--strict-warnings Configure option. OpenSSL compiles on many varied
6744
platforms: try to ensure you only use portable features.
45+
Clean builds via Travis and AppVeyor are expected, and done whenever
46+
a PR is created or updated.
6847

69-
5. When at all possible, patches should include tests. These can either be
70-
added to an existing test, or completely new. Please see test/README
71-
for information on the test framework.
48+
5. When at all possible, patches should include tests. These can
49+
either be added to an existing test, or completely new. Please see
50+
test/README for information on the test framework.
7251

73-
6. New features or changed functionality must include documentation. Please
74-
look at the "pod" files in doc/apps, doc/crypto and doc/ssl for examples of
75-
our style.
52+
6. New features or changed functionality must include
53+
documentation. Please look at the "pod" files in doc/apps, doc/crypto
54+
and doc/ssl for examples of our style.

‎deps/openssl/openssl/Configure‎

Lines changed: 27 additions & 7 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ eval 'exec perl -S $0 ${1+"$@"}'
77

88
require 5.000;
99
use strict;
10+
use File::Compare;
1011

1112
# see INSTALL for instructions.
1213

@@ -57,12 +58,13 @@ my $usage="Usage: Configure [no-<cipher> ...] [enable-<cipher> ...] [experimenta
5758
# zlib-dynamic Like "zlib", but the zlib library is expected to be a shared
5859
# library and will be loaded in run-time by the OpenSSL library.
5960
# sctp include SCTP support
60-
# 386 generate 80386 code
6161
# enable-weak-ssl-ciphers
6262
# Enable EXPORT and LOW SSLv3 ciphers that are disabled by
6363
# default. Note, weak SSLv2 ciphers are unconditionally
6464
# disabled.
65-
# no-sse2 disables IA-32 SSE2 code, above option implies no-sse2
65+
# 386 generate 80386 code in assembly modules
66+
# no-sse2 disables IA-32 SSE2 code in assembly modules, the above
67+
# mentioned '386' option implies this one
6668
# no-<cipher> build without specified algorithm (rsa, idea, rc5, ...)
6769
# -<xxx> +<xxx> compiler options are passed through
6870
#
@@ -1792,8 +1794,16 @@ while (<IN>)
17921794
}
17931795
close(IN);
17941796
close(OUT);
1795-
rename($Makefile,"$Makefile.bak") || die "unable to rename $Makefile\n" if -e $Makefile;
1796-
rename("$Makefile.new",$Makefile) || die "unable to rename $Makefile.new\n";
1797+
if ((compare($Makefile, "$Makefile.new"))
1798+
or file_newer('Configure', $Makefile)
1799+
or file_newer('config', $Makefile)
1800+
or file_newer('Makefile.org', $Makefile))
1801+
{
1802+
rename($Makefile,"$Makefile.bak") || die "unable to rename $Makefile\n" if -e $Makefile;
1803+
rename("$Makefile.new",$Makefile) || die "unable to rename $Makefile.new\n";
1804+
}
1805+
else
1806+
{ unlink("$Makefile.new"); }
17971807

17981808
print "CC =$cc\n";
17991809
print "CFLAG =$cflags\n";
@@ -1985,9 +1995,13 @@ print OUT "#ifdef __cplusplus\n";
19851995
print OUT "}\n";
19861996
print OUT "#endif\n";
19871997
close(OUT);
1988-
rename("crypto/opensslconf.h","crypto/opensslconf.h.bak") || die "unable to rename crypto/opensslconf.h\n" if -e "crypto/opensslconf.h";
1989-
rename("crypto/opensslconf.h.new","crypto/opensslconf.h") || die "unable to rename crypto/opensslconf.h.new\n";
1990-
1998+
if (compare("crypto/opensslconf.h.new","crypto/opensslconf.h"))
1999+
{
2000+
rename("crypto/opensslconf.h","crypto/opensslconf.h.bak") || die "unable to rename crypto/opensslconf.h\n" if -e "crypto/opensslconf.h";
2001+
rename("crypto/opensslconf.h.new","crypto/opensslconf.h") || die "unable to rename crypto/opensslconf.h.new\n";
2002+
}
2003+
else
2004+
{ unlink("crypto/opensslconf.h.new"); }
19912005

19922006
# Fix the date
19932007

@@ -2289,3 +2303,9 @@ sub test_sanity
22892303
print STDERR "No sanity errors detected!\n" if $errorcnt == 0;
22902304
return $errorcnt;
22912305
}
2306+
2307+
sub file_newer
2308+
{
2309+
my ($file1, $file2) = @_;
2310+
return (stat($file1))[9] > (stat($file2))[9]
2311+
}

‎deps/openssl/openssl/INSTALL‎

Lines changed: 38 additions & 31 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -74,24 +74,26 @@
7474

7575
no-asm Do not use assembler code.
7676

77-
386 Use the 80386 instruction set only (the default x86 code is
78-
more efficient, but requires at least a 486). Note: Use
79-
compiler flags for any other CPU specific configuration,
80-
e.g. "-m32" to build x86 code on an x64 system.
81-
82-
no-sse2 Exclude SSE2 code pathes. Normally SSE2 extention is
83-
detected at run-time, but the decision whether or not the
84-
machine code will be executed is taken solely on CPU
85-
capability vector. This means that if you happen to run OS
86-
kernel which does not support SSE2 extension on Intel P4
87-
processor, then your application might be exposed to
88-
"illegal instruction" exception. There might be a way
89-
to enable support in kernel, e.g. FreeBSD kernel can be
90-
compiled with CPU_ENABLE_SSE, and there is a way to
91-
disengage SSE2 code pathes upon application start-up,
92-
but if you aim for wider "audience" running such kernel,
93-
consider no-sse2. Both 386 and no-asm options above imply
94-
no-sse2.
77+
386 In 32-bit x86 builds, when generating assembly modules,
78+
use the 80386 instruction set only (the default x86 code
79+
is more efficient, but requires at least a 486). Note:
80+
This doesn't affect code generated by compiler, you're
81+
likely to complement configuration command line with
82+
suitable compiler-specific option.
83+
84+
no-sse2 Exclude SSE2 code paths from 32-bit x86 assembly modules.
85+
Normally SSE2 extension is detected at run-time, but the
86+
decision whether or not the machine code will be executed
87+
is taken solely on CPU capability vector. This means that
88+
if you happen to run OS kernel which does not support SSE2
89+
extension on Intel P4 processor, then your application
90+
might be exposed to "illegal instruction" exception.
91+
There might be a way to enable support in kernel, e.g.
92+
FreeBSD kernel can be compiled with CPU_ENABLE_SSE, and
93+
there is a way to disengage SSE2 code paths upon application
94+
start-up, but if you aim for wider "audience" running
95+
such kernel, consider no-sse2. Both the 386 and
96+
no-asm options imply no-sse2.
9597

9698
no-<cipher> Build without the specified cipher (bf, cast, des, dh, dsa,
9799
hmac, md2, md5, mdc2, rc2, rc4, rc5, rsa, sha).
@@ -101,7 +103,12 @@
101103
-Dxxx, -lxxx, -Lxxx, -fxxx, -mXXX, -Kxxx These system specific options will
102104
be passed through to the compiler to allow you to
103105
define preprocessor symbols, specify additional libraries,
104-
library directories or other compiler options.
106+
library directories or other compiler options. It might be
107+
worth noting that some compilers generate code specifically
108+
for processor the compiler currently executes on. This is
109+
not necessarily what you might have in mind, since it might
110+
be unsuitable for execution on other, typically older,
111+
processor. Consult your compiler documentation.
105112

106113
-DHAVE_CRYPTODEV Enable the BSD cryptodev engine even if we are not using
107114
BSD. Useful if you are running ocf-linux or something
@@ -159,18 +166,18 @@
159166
OpenSSL binary ("openssl"). The libraries will be built in the top-level
160167
directory, and the binary will be in the "apps" directory.
161168

162-
If "make" fails, look at the output. There may be reasons for
163-
the failure that aren't problems in OpenSSL itself (like missing
164-
standard headers). If it is a problem with OpenSSL itself, please
165-
report the problem to <openssl-bugs@openssl.org> (note that your
166-
message will be recorded in the request tracker publicly readable
167-
at https://www.openssl.org/community/index.html#bugs and will be
168-
forwarded to a public mailing list). Include the output of "make
169-
report" in your message. Please check out the request tracker. Maybe
170-
the bug was already reported or has already been fixed.
171-
172-
[If you encounter assembler error messages, try the "no-asm"
173-
configuration option as an immediate fix.]
169+
If the build fails, look at the output. There may be reasons
170+
for the failure that aren't problems in OpenSSL itself (like
171+
missing standard headers). If you are having problems you can
172+
get help by sending an email to the openssl-users email list (see
173+
https://www.openssl.org/community/mailinglists.html for details). If
174+
it is a bug with OpenSSL itself, please open an issue on GitHub, at
175+
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues. Please review the existing
176+
ones first; maybe the bug was already reported or has already been
177+
fixed.
178+
179+
(If you encounter assembler error messages, try the "no-asm"
180+
configuration option as an immediate fix.)
174181

175182
Compiling parts of OpenSSL with gcc and others with the system
176183
compiler will result in unresolved symbols on some systems.

‎deps/openssl/openssl/Makefile‎

Lines changed: 3 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
44
## Makefile for OpenSSL
55
##
66

7-
VERSION=1.0.2j
7+
VERSION=1.0.2k
88
MAJOR=1
99
MINOR=0.2
1010
SHLIB_VERSION_NUMBER=1.0.0
@@ -203,7 +203,8 @@ CLEARENV= TOP= && unset TOP $${LIB+LIB} $${LIBS+LIBS} \
203203
$${ASFLAGS+ASFLAGS} $${AFLAGS+AFLAGS} \
204204
$${LDCMD+LDCMD} $${LDFLAGS+LDFLAGS} $${SCRIPTS+SCRIPTS} \
205205
$${SHAREDCMD+SHAREDCMD} $${SHAREDFLAGS+SHAREDFLAGS} \
206-
$${SHARED_LIB+SHARED_LIB} $${LIBEXTRAS+LIBEXTRAS}
206+
$${SHARED_LIB+SHARED_LIB} $${LIBEXTRAS+LIBEXTRAS} \
207+
$${APPS+APPS}
207208

208209
# LC_ALL=C ensures that error [and other] messages are delivered in
209210
# same language for uniform treatment.

‎deps/openssl/openssl/Makefile.bak‎

Lines changed: 3 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
44
## Makefile for OpenSSL
55
##
66

7-
VERSION=1.0.2j
7+
VERSION=1.0.2k
88
MAJOR=1
99
MINOR=0.2
1010
SHLIB_VERSION_NUMBER=1.0.0
@@ -203,7 +203,8 @@ CLEARENV= TOP= && unset TOP $${LIB+LIB} $${LIBS+LIBS} \
203203
$${ASFLAGS+ASFLAGS} $${AFLAGS+AFLAGS} \
204204
$${LDCMD+LDCMD} $${LDFLAGS+LDFLAGS} $${SCRIPTS+SCRIPTS} \
205205
$${SHAREDCMD+SHAREDCMD} $${SHAREDFLAGS+SHAREDFLAGS} \
206-
$${SHARED_LIB+SHARED_LIB} $${LIBEXTRAS+LIBEXTRAS}
206+
$${SHARED_LIB+SHARED_LIB} $${LIBEXTRAS+LIBEXTRAS} \
207+
$${APPS+APPS}
207208

208209
# LC_ALL=C ensures that error [and other] messages are delivered in
209210
# same language for uniform treatment.

‎deps/openssl/openssl/Makefile.org‎

Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -201,7 +201,8 @@ CLEARENV= TOP= && unset TOP $${LIB+LIB} $${LIBS+LIBS} \
201201
$${ASFLAGS+ASFLAGS} $${AFLAGS+AFLAGS} \
202202
$${LDCMD+LDCMD} $${LDFLAGS+LDFLAGS} $${SCRIPTS+SCRIPTS} \
203203
$${SHAREDCMD+SHAREDCMD} $${SHAREDFLAGS+SHAREDFLAGS} \
204-
$${SHARED_LIB+SHARED_LIB} $${LIBEXTRAS+LIBEXTRAS}
204+
$${SHARED_LIB+SHARED_LIB} $${LIBEXTRAS+LIBEXTRAS} \
205+
$${APPS+APPS}
205206

206207
# LC_ALL=C ensures that error [and other] messages are delivered in
207208
# same language for uniform treatment.

‎deps/openssl/openssl/NEWS‎

Lines changed: 7 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -5,9 +5,15 @@
55
This file gives a brief overview of the major changes between each OpenSSL
66
release. For more details please read the CHANGES file.
77

8+
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.0.2j and OpenSSL 1.0.2k [26 Jan 2017]
9+
10+
o Truncated packet could crash via OOB read (CVE-2017-3731)
11+
o BN_mod_exp may produce incorrect results on x86_64 (CVE-2017-3732)
12+
o Montgomery multiplication may produce incorrect results (CVE-2016-7055)
13+
814
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.0.2i and OpenSSL 1.0.2j [26 Sep 2016]
915

10-
o Fix Use After Free for large message sizes (CVE-2016-6309)
16+
o Missing CRL sanity check (CVE-2016-7052)
1117

1218
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.0.2h and OpenSSL 1.0.2i [22 Sep 2016]
1319

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)

Footer

© 2026 GitHub, Inc.
Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL