| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
1 parent b8213f1 commit 6c41f33
1 file changed
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
@@ -137,8 +137,8 @@ notes about [commit squashing](#commit-squashing)). | |||
| 137 | 137 | A good commit message should describe what changed and why. | |
| 138 | 138 | ||
| 139 | 139 | 1. The first line should: | |
| 140 | - - contain a short description of the change (preferably 50 characters or less, | ||
| 141 | - and no more than 72 characters) | ||
| 140 | + - contain a short description of the change (preferably 50 characters or | ||
| 141 | + less, and no more than 72 characters) | ||
| 142 | 142 | - be entirely in lowercase with the exception of proper nouns, acronyms, and | |
| 143 | 143 | the words that refer to code, like function/variable names | |
| 144 | 144 | - be prefixed with the name of the changed subsystem and start with an | |
@@ -456,7 +456,8 @@ Focus first on the most significant aspects of the change: | |||
| 456 | 456 | 1. Does this change make sense for Node.js? | |
| 457 | 457 | 2. Does this change make Node.js better, even if only incrementally? | |
| 458 | 458 | 3. Are there clear bugs or larger scale issues that need attending to? | |
| 459 | - 4. Is the commit message readable and correct? If it contains a breaking change is it clear enough? | ||
| 459 | + 4. Is the commit message readable and correct? If it contains a breaking change | ||
| 460 | + is it clear enough? | ||
| 460 | 461 | ||
| 461 | 462 | When changes are necessary, *request* them, do not *demand* them, and do not | |
| 462 | 463 | assume that the submitter already knows how to add a test or run a benchmark. | |
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
0 commit comments