The question becomes what do people use that link for? I personally use it to validate that I'm looking at the project that's behind a certain website or to get to the homepage quickly, not to get to developer documentation. I always assume the README and/or CONTRIBUTING files will have the dev doc links.
I think we are all way over-thinking a single link 😉 . Maybe it would be better to just have 3 quick links listed at the top of the README: www.python.org, docs.python.org, and the devguide.
@Mariatta's addition looks good to me, and should be useful to folks looking at the README offline as well.
As far as the project level link goes, I think the reason it bugs me is just because our top level directory and file listing is long enough to push the start of the README off the bottom of the page. And yes, I'm almost certainly overthinking it :)
Activity
brettcannon commented on Feb 15, 2017
There's no good way to provide two links in the repo title as that link is a specific, separate field from the description.
ncoghlan commented on Feb 18, 2017
In that case, I'll rephrase the proposal to suggest linking to the developer guide instead of linking to python.org :)
brettcannon commented on Feb 24, 2017
The question becomes what do people use that link for? I personally use it to validate that I'm looking at the project that's behind a certain website or to get to the homepage quickly, not to get to developer documentation. I always assume the README and/or CONTRIBUTING files will have the dev doc links.
Mariatta commented on Feb 24, 2017
🤔 Maybe instead of www.python.org, it should be pointing to docs.python.org?
It is part of cpython repo
brettcannon commented on Feb 24, 2017
I think we are all way over-thinking a single link 😉 . Maybe it would be better to just have 3 quick links listed at the top of the README: www.python.org, docs.python.org, and the devguide.
Mariatta commented on Feb 25, 2017
Sounds good to me :)
Please see my proposed PR at python/cpython#283
ncoghlan commented on Feb 25, 2017
@Mariatta's addition looks good to me, and should be useful to folks looking at the README offline as well.
As far as the project level link goes, I think the reason it bugs me is just because our top level directory and file listing is long enough to push the start of the README off the bottom of the page. And yes, I'm almost certainly overthinking it :)
brettcannon commented on Feb 27, 2017
Since Mariatta's proposed PR was merged I'm closing this.