FAIL: test_rollover_based_on_st_birthtime_only (test.test_logging.TimedRotatingFileHandlerTest.test_rollover_based_on_st_birthtime_only)
AssertionError: False is not true : No rotated files found, went back 5 seconds
This is the test that gh-150960 (fixed by GH-150954, which widened the search from 5 to 6 timestamps) was about. The diagnostics the test prints show why it still fails on a slow machine:
Test time: 2026-09-01 15-10-51
The only matching files are: ['test_logging-2-p8i89g4b.log', 'test_logging-2-p8i89g4b.log.2026-09-01_15-10-45']
Contents of test_logging-2-p8i89g4b.log:
2026-09-01 15:10:51,079 testing - new record supposedly in the new file after rollover
Contents of test_logging-2-p8i89g4b.log.2026-09-01_15-10-45:
2026-09-01 15:10:45,004 testing - initial
2026-09-01 15:10:47,105 testing - update before rollover to renew the st_mtime
The rollover happened and is correct. The rotated file is named after the start of the interval, which is the creation time of the log file (TimedRotatingFileHandler.__init__() computes rolloverAt from min(creation_time, modification_time), and doRollover() uses rolloverAt - interval for the suffix), so its suffix is 15-10-45. The test then looks for a rotated file with a timestamp between now and now - 5 s. now was 15:10:51, six seconds after the file was created, because the third add_record() came 3.97 s after the second one instead of about 2.1 s. So the file with suffix 15-10-45 was one second outside the window.
The test's timing (two time.sleep(2.1) calls plus three handler set-ups and emits) is nominally 4.2 s, and any slowdown of more than 0.8 s pushes the rotated file out of the fixed 5-second window. The window should be derived from the time the test actually took, since the suffix can never be older than the moment the log file was created.
Activity