| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
|
I've messed up the issue number, sorry! |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Looks like this hack was added in ~2006. Some research of existing code to see if anything still relies on it is warranted before merging, it seems very unlikely. if so we'd want a deprecation period. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Quoting the original issue:
I've done a minimal research. I was not able to find any references to it. I don't feel qualified in this specific module and its history to make an educated decision here. However, deprecation period is always a good idea 👍 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, but please complete the doc.
This attribute was untested and undocumented. I never heard about it.
Looks like not a single GitHub project uses it.
I ran a code search in PyPI top 5000 projects: no projects use it.
$ ./search_pypi_top.py PYPI-2020-09-01/ '_use_broken_old_ctypes_structure_semantics_' -q Found 0 matching lines in 0 projects
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks! FWIW I also searched our huge internal codebase at Google, nothing found that uses this odd thing.
Sorry, something went wrong.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.