In the guide, there is a section about the meta tracker which links to this site, which appears to be non-functional (it's a blank page to me). The tracker itself links to this site. Is that the correct meta tracker?
GitMate.io thinks possibly related issues are #299 (Broken link to Copyright page.), #221 (broken links and 404), python/core-workflow#54 (Travis tests are broken), #321 (Propose change to new user link for documentation issues on the bug tracker), and python/core-workflow#224 (Double link to the same PR).
Something needs to be cleared up. The psf_infra_meta is much older (June 2017) and is not limited to the bugs.python.org, in spite of what readme.md says. The bugs.python.org tracker is specific and has more issues. It starts with python/bugs.python.org#1 about migrating open issues from the old tracker. I added a comment there about making b.p.o, devguide, and psf-infra-meta consistent.
Activity
Mariatta commented on Feb 6, 2019
GitMate.io thinks possibly related issues are #299 (Broken link to Copyright page.), #221 (broken links and 404), python/core-workflow#54 (Travis tests are broken), #321 (Propose change to new user link for documentation issues on the bug tracker), and python/core-workflow#224 (Double link to the same PR).
Mariatta commented on Feb 6, 2019
I think it should be this url now? https://github.com/python/bugs.python.org
terryjreedy commented on Feb 6, 2019
Something needs to be cleared up. The psf_infra_meta is much older (June 2017) and is not limited to the bugs.python.org, in spite of what readme.md says. The bugs.python.org tracker is specific and has more issues. It starts with python/bugs.python.org#1 about migrating open issues from the old tracker. I added a comment there about making b.p.o, devguide, and psf-infra-meta consistent.
ezio-melotti commented on May 7, 2022
The section about the meta tracker is now gone, so this can be closed.