| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
* Preserve unsupported entry, string, preamble, and comment source as explicit failures. * Recover subsequent supported blocks on the same or following line.
|
Hi @claell — same note across all of your July 16 issues and PRs (#567–#597), apologies for the repetition. Closing this. Passing CI isn't evidence the underlying claim is real — it just means generated tests match generated code. The batch's timing, structure, and forward-referenced numbers point to this being AI-generated rather than manually found and checked, and reviewing it properly would take more effort than a targeted pass over the parser myself. If this fixes something you actually hit: open a small, human-verified PR against a reopened issue with a real repro, and I'll review it in good faith. Any nontrivial design or API choice needs to be discussed and agreed first, not decided inside a PR. Please disclose and verify AI-assisted work before submitting going forward. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Summary
comments instead of classifying them as implicit comments.
parenthesis parsing remains unsupported.
an unclosed parenthesis block.
Fixes #533 by taking the issue's fail-closed interim option. This does not claim
to implement full parenthesis-delimited parsing.
Validation
passed.
deprecation warnings in tests/test_entrypoint.py.
environment; GitHub CI should independently run the configured hooks.
Review note
This change was developed and validated in a concentrated session rather than
exercised over a long period in production. The recovery scanner handles nested
parentheses, braces, quotes, and subsequent blocks, but careful human review of
malformed-input edge cases is particularly important.
AI assistance
This pull request was prepared with ChatGPT Codex using GPT-5.6 Sol with high
reasoning effort. Codex assisted with analysis, implementation, branch
isolation, and test execution. Automated validation is not a substitute for
maintainer review.