| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
… branch CI cloned github.com/AuthPlane/conformance at its default branch, so any change to the catalog reached this repo immediately — a case added there could turn an unrelated PR red here with nothing in this repo having changed. Pinning decouples them: a catalog change arrives only when this repo deliberately bumps the pin together with the coverage for it. The revision is single-sourced in a tracked .conformance-catalog-ref, guarded by a 40-hex shape check before the fetch so a branch or tag name cannot silently un-pin CI, and read by both ci.yml and release.yml. A weekly conformance-catalog-drift workflow clones the unpinned tip and runs the alignment assertion, so new cases surface as an early warning instead of a surprise at bump time. No SDK source changes. Verified locally against the pinned revision: the catalog alignment assertion passes, the conformance suite is green (104 passed, 1 xfailed — the xfail is pre-existing and unrelated), and the core suite is green (525). The pin adopts no new case ids, so it requires no coverage change.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
What
CI clones github.com/AuthPlane/conformance at its default branch, so any change
to the catalog reaches this repo immediately. A case added there can turn an
unrelated PR red here with nothing in this repo having changed.
This pins the revision instead. A catalog change arrives only when this repo
deliberately bumps the pin together with the coverage for it.
guarded by a shape check before the fetch so a branch or tag name cannot
silently un-pin CI.
the unpinned tip and runs the alignment assertion, so new cases surface as an
early warning rather than a surprise at bump time.
The catalog lands in $RUNNER_TEMP, outside the workspace, so it stays out of
test discovery and coverage globs.
Scope
No SDK source is touched — four files, all CI.
Verification
Run locally against the pinned revision:
pre-existing and unrelated to the pin),
The pin adopts no new case ids, so it requires no coverage change. actionlint
clean on both modified workflows.
Known follow-up, deliberately not fixed here
The read/guard/fetch block is duplicated in ci.yml and release.yml. The ref
is single-sourced; the ten lines reading it are not, so the guard could be
tightened in one workflow and not the other.
Extracting it to a shared script is the right fix. It is left out here so this PR
stays a pin and nothing else — the extraction changes how both workflows fetch,
which deserves its own diff and its own review rather than riding along with a
mechanical change.