Add evaluate to operator type - #415
Merged
chris-pardy merged 1 commit intoFeb 16, 2026
Merged
chris-pardy merged 1 commit into
chris-pardy merged 1 commit into
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Sorry, something went wrong.
chris-pardy
approved these changes
Feb 16, 2026
chris-pardy
left a comment
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Makes sense to expose the existing evaluate method in the types. Thanks @mlh758!
Sorry, something went wrong.
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The operator class has an evaluate method. It's helpful to be able to call it explicitly to test custom operators so I'm updating the type definition to include it.