Properly catch unset preferences - #16
Open
w-biggs wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
w-biggs wants to merge 1 commit into
w-biggs wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Sorry, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With Darktable 5.4.1, when trying to load this script, this error fires:
5.4318 LUA ERROR: dtutils.lua: prequire: 223: Error loading contrib/nind_denoise_rl 5.4319 LUA ERROR: dtutils.lua: prequire: 224: Error returned is bad argument #3 to '?' (number expected, got nil) 5.4319 LUA ERROR: script_manager.lua: activate: 541: error loading contrib/nind_denoise_rl 5.4319 LUA ERROR: script_manager.lua: activate: 542: error message: bad argument #3 to '?' (number expected, got nil)It seems like some API change made it so dt.preferences.read returns empty strings for unset preferences instead of erroring? I'm not 100% sure, but this prevents that from propagating down and causing errors