FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

Turn off deploy to AppEngine by elharo · Pull Request #83 · GoogleCloudPlatform/cloud-code-intellij · GitHub

Turn off deploy to AppEngine - #83

Closed
elharo wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
b24467527
Closed

Turn off deploy to AppEngine#83
elharo wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
b24467527

Conversation

elharo commented Sep 29, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

What would be the module name we'd key off of to find out if we're inside android studio?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

based off of the same jetbrains doc page it looks like it's:

com.intellij.modules.androidstudio

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Elliotte Rusty Harold <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

In core-plugin/src/META-INF/plugin.xml
#83 (comment)
:

@@ -126,11 +126,6 @@

  • <action id="GoogleCloudTools.DeployToAppEngine"

What would be the module name we'd key off of to find out if we're inside
android studio?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/gcloud-intellij/pull/83/files#r40686167
.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

done

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

argh. I didn't think we'd have to do all this. Does this show up as a separate plugin? Did you try just including a fargment?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

Per Jetbrains:

<!-- Optional dependency on another plugin. If the plugin with the "MySecondPlugin" ID is installed, the contents of mysecondplugin.xml (the format of this file conforms to the format of plugin.xml) will be loaded. -->
<depends optional="true" config-file="mysecondplugin.xml">MySecondPlugin</depends>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

link? The previous docs make it sound like an extension to the existing
plugin:

You can also specify optional module dependencies. If your plugin works
with all products but provides some Java-specific functionality, you can
use a dependency tag like this:

com.intellij.modules.java

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Elliotte Rusty Harold <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

In core-plugin/src/META-INF/android-studio-features.xml
#83 (comment)
:

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+

  • Google Cloud Tools Deploy To Apop Engine

Per Jetbrains:

MySecondPlugin


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/gcloud-intellij/pull/83/files#r40719402
.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

Build the plugin and install it into Android Studio?
http://developer.android.com/tools/studio/index.html

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Elliotte Rusty Harold <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

In core-plugin/src/META-INF/android-studio-features.xml
#83 (comment)
:

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+

  • Google Cloud Tools Deploy To Apop Engine

http://www.jetbrains.org/intellij/sdk/docs/basics/plugin_structure/plugin_configuration_file.html

I agree this isn't perfectly clear. How shoudl we test it?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/gcloud-intellij/pull/83/files#r40726527
.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

It may or may not overwrite the existing plugin. That in itself will be a
learning experience.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Patrick Flynn paflynn@google.com wrote:

Build the plugin and install it into Android Studio?
http://developer.android.com/tools/studio/index.html

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Elliotte Rusty Harold <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

In core-plugin/src/META-INF/android-studio-features.xml
#83 (comment)
:

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+

  • Google Cloud Tools Deploy To Apop Engine

http://www.jetbrains.org/intellij/sdk/docs/basics/plugin_structure/plugin_configuration_file.html

I agree this isn't perfectly clear. How shoudl we test it?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/gcloud-intellij/pull/83/files#r40726527
.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

So it appears neither this nor the approach where we jus tput the action into android-studio-features works. Both fail to load in AS. :-(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

Let's just remove it from the plugin.xml for now. We've already agreed we
want to move all of this out from core into our AS plugin anyway.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Elliotte Rusty Harold <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

In core-plugin/src/META-INF/android-studio-features.xml
#83 (comment)
:

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+

  • Google Cloud Tools Deploy To Apop Engine

So it appears neither this nor the approach where we jus tput the action
into android-studio-features works. Both fail to load in AS. :-(


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/gcloud-intellij/pull/83/files#r40841869
.

elharo closed this Oct 1, 2015
elharo deleted the b24467527 branch October 1, 2015 13:23
etanshaul pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2019
* make sure kotlin plugin version takes precedence.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL