| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Author: puneith <puneith@google.com>
Author: puneith <puneith@google.com>
Author: puneith <puneith@google.com>
Author: puneith <puneith@google.com>
Author: puneith <puneith@google.com>
Author: puneith <puneith@google.com>
Author: puneith <puneith@google.com>
Author: puneith <puneith@google.com>
Author: puneith <puneith@google.com>
Author: puneith <puneith@google.com>
Author: puneith <puneith@google.com>
Author: puneith <puneith@google.com>
Current coverage is 44.59%@@ master #267 diff @@
==========================================
Files 77 78 +1
Lines 2164 2267 +103
Methods 0 0
Messages 0 0
Branches 148 154 +6
==========================================
- Hits 1012 1011 -1
- Misses 1121 1225 +104
Partials 31 31
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
| // | ||
| // Then set environment variable GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS to the full path of that file. | ||
|
|
||
| package com.google.cloud.speech.grpc.demos; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For new samples we have been using com.example package instead of com.google. This is to make it more clear to the user that they can change the package to match their own project.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This structure already existed. I didn't mess up with the package name. Change it still?
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry about pinging on the package name, it looks like whom ever reviewed the first version wasn't on the Java team. :(
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@lesv @tswast Its common to put company name in the package even samples. This is google code so why not? https://github.com/linkedin/api-get-started/tree/master/java/src/com/linkedin/sample
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
See RFC 2606
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
For the README.md - is the whole SERVICE ACCOUNT stuff still required? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
| or [homebrew](http://brew.sh/)) to convert audio files to raw format. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Run the non-streaming client | ||
| ### Run the sync client |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How does it work on Windows?
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Don't know, is that a blocker?
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@lesv we don't have the instructions anywhere otherwise and assuming users would have read everything before using this sample is not correct either. So we need them IMHO.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please add an issue for this.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Issue for windows or that we don't have instructions anywhere else?
Sorry, something went wrong.
| @@ -73,20 +73,35 @@ note that the audio file must be in RAW format. You can use `sox` | |||
| (available, e.g. via [http://sox.sourceforge.net/](http://sox.sourceforge.net/) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
README should mention that this is BETA software w/ a link to what that means: https://cloud.google.com/terms/launch-stages
It should also mention that this samples is for Advanced Users.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
LGTM |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
There should be some additional items for catchup after merge. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Fixes #292 #268 #267 ☕️ This is the draft I do not know it is considered as good test design using base class I basically got the idea from the stack overflow answer: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8295100/how-to-re-run-failed-junit-tests-immediately
Fixes #292 #268 #267 ☕️ This is the draft I do not know it is considered as good test design using base class I basically got the idea from the stack overflow answer: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8295100/how-to-re-run-failed-junit-tests-immediately
Fixes #292 #268 #267 ☕️ This is the draft I do not know it is considered as good test design using base class I basically got the idea from the stack overflow answer: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8295100/how-to-re-run-failed-junit-tests-immediately
Fixes #292 #268 #267 ☕️ This is the draft I do not know it is considered as good test design using base class I basically got the idea from the stack overflow answer: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8295100/how-to-re-run-failed-junit-tests-immediately
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
@tswast Please review. This PR contains the changes due to Speech API changes, namely Sync, Async and Streaming.