FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

Make a CDK zip instead of having a CDK repo by LeafHacker · Pull Request #17 · ImpactDevelopment/ClientAPI · GitHub

This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 19, 2019. It is now read-only.

Make a CDK zip instead of having a CDK repo - #17

Merged
LeafHacker merged 1 commit into
ImpactDevelopment:masterfrom
LeafHacker:cdk
Aug 14, 2017
Merged

Make a CDK zip instead of having a CDK repo#17
LeafHacker merged 1 commit into
ImpactDevelopment:masterfrom
LeafHacker:cdk

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Inspired by the way Forge builds its MDK, we should do the same with out CDK.

We don't really need a separate repo for the CDK, when really we want to build a CDK zip whenever we update ClientAPI.

This commit adds a build task to do just that. It takes generic files from ClientAPI (license, gradle), CDK specific files and the example source code and archives them as a zip file in build/distributions.

This means we kan keep all the CDK specific files here (in a cdk dir) and stop maintaining yet another repo.


This also means that the example code is no longer needed in multiple locations and we will be able to bin the complicated submodule setup. I've not done that here to keep the commit small/single purpose and because the example repo isn't up to date with @ZeroMemes's local copy.

We don't really need a separate repo for the CDK, when really we want to
build a CDK zip whenever we update ClientAPI.

This commit adds a build task to do just that. It takes generic files
from ClientAPI (license, gradle), CDK specific files and the example
source code and archives them as a zip file in build/distributions.

This means we kan keep all the CDK specific files here (in a cdk dir)
and stop maintaining yet another repo.
LeafHacker added this to the 2.2 milestone Aug 13, 2017
LeafHacker changed the title Make a CDK from files here instead of having a CDK repo Make a CDK zip instead of having a CDK repo Aug 13, 2017
LeafHacker requested a review from ZeroMemes August 14, 2017 07:30

ZeroMemes left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

Looks good™

LeafHacker merged commit 1731ee5 into ImpactDevelopment:master Aug 14, 2017
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL