| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
| Name | Name | Last commit date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientist-aligned benchmark for evaluating Scientific General Intelligence (SGI) across the full inquiry cycle: Deliberation, Conception, Action, and Perception. The benchmark spans 10 disciplines and more than 1,000 expert‑curated samples inspired by Science’s 125 Big Questions, with an agentic evaluation framework and multi‑metric protocol.
🚩 Update (2026-06-02) SGI-Bench datasets on Hugging Face are now gated to prevent evaluated agents from finding benchmark questions through web search. Access is automatic after agreeing to share contact information; set HF_TOKEN with a read-only Hugging Face token before running evaluations.
🚩 Update (2025-12-22) We release SGI-Bench paper on arXiv.
🚩 Update (2025-12-19) SGI-Bench is adapted to VLMEvalKit and SciEvalKit, both of which are highly efficient and comprehensive evaluation toolkits.
🎤 Talk (2025-12-18) We are invited to give a talk on large language model evaluation at the AI Insight Talk jointly organized by OpenMMLab, Zhihu, and ModelScope.
🚩 Update (2025-12-12) We evaluate the newly released GPT-5.2-Pro on SGI-Bench.
👉 More News (Click to expand)🚩 Update (2025-12-10) We update the paper PDF on the page.
🚩 Update (2025-12-03) We officially release the data and code of SGI-Bench.
SGI denotes an AI system that can autonomously navigate the full, iterative cycle of scientific inquiry—Deliberation, Conception, Action, and Perception—with the versatility and proficiency of a human scientist. SGI‑Bench operationalizes this definition via four scientist‑aligned task families: scientific deep research, idea generation, dry/wet experiments, and multimodal experimental reasoning.
Grounded in the Practical Inquiry Model (PIM), SGI‑Bench treats science as an iterative cycle linking deliberation, conception, action and perception. Under this lens, SGI captures the capacity to integrate knowledge retrieval, idea formation, action execution, and interpretation into a unified loop of inquiry.
Result: High‑fidelity, scientist‑aligned tasks that are authentic, challenging, and broadly representative.
This agent‑based stack formalizes scoring into traceable stages, improves reproducibility, mitigates evaluator–model coupling bias, and yields actionable, scientist‑aligned insights.
TTRL converts open‑ended ideation into measurable test‑time optimization and extends to multi‑objective rewards (rigor, feasibility, safety, cost).
| Model | Deep Research | Idea Generation | Dry Experiment | Wet Experiment | Experimental Reasoning | SGI-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini-3-Pro 🥇 | 18.48 | 39.68 | 36.64 | 32.45 | 41.92 | 33.83 |
| Claude-Sonnet-4.5 🥈 | 13.84 | 43.20 | 35.79 | 30.15 | 37.80 | 32.16 |
| Qwen3-Max 🥉 | 15.38 | 39.83 | 33.21 | 33.62 | 37.80 | 31.97 |
| GPT-4.1 | 11.32 | 36.49 | 34.32 | 36.63 | 38.49 | 31.45 |
| GPT-5.2-Pro | 15.72 | 55.03 | 28.04 | 17.50 | 39.18 | 31.09 |
| GPT-5 | 14.47 | 55.40 | 29.89 | 16.31 | 38.14 | 30.84 |
| o3 | 12.89 | 46.07 | 31.73 | 30.04 | 32.65 | 30.68 |
| Claude-Opus-4.1 | 12.93 | 40.29 | 34.69 | 25.38 | 38.83 | 30.42 |
| o4-mini | 11.95 | 40.78 | 35.79 | 28.86 | 33.33 | 30.14 |
| GPT-5.1 | 11.64 | 47.12 | 31.00 | 22.77 | 34.02 | 29.31 |
| Grok-4 | 13.31 | 37.12 | 33.71 | 29.01 | 30.24 | 28.68 |
| Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B | 11.97 | 39.28 | 28.41 | 30.30 | 31.62 | 28.32 |
| Gemini-2.5-Pro | 15.09 | 39.95 | 22.51 | 22.05 | 41.24 | 28.17 |
| Intern-S1 | 15.74 | 38.09 | 28.79 | 29.02 | 28.87 | 28.10 |
| GPT-4o | 7.86 | 35.95 | 26.94 | 31.31 | 32.30 | 26.87 |
| Gemini-2.5-Flash | 10.69 | 39.13 | 21.03 | 18.55 | 34.36 | 24.75 |
| Llama-4-Scout | 7.86 | 29.72 | 20.37 | 21.66 | 25.77 | 21.08 |
| Qwen3-8B | 8.18 | 35.78 | 18.45 | 9.96 | 23.37 | 19.15 |
| Intern-S1-mini | 11.06 | 36.04 | 16.97 | 12.42 | 16.84 | 18.67 |
git clone https://github.com/InternScience/SGI-Bench.git
cd SGI-Bench/evaluation
export OPENAI_API_KEY="xxxxx"
export OPENAI_BASE_URL="xxxxx"
export HF_TOKEN="hf_xxxxx"
conda create -n sgi python=3.13.7
conda activate sgi
pip install -r requirements.txtSGI-Bench datasets are gated on Hugging Face. Log in, open the dataset page, and click the button to agree to share your contact information. This is automatic and does not require manual approval; the gate only prevents evaluated agents from directly finding benchmark questions through web search. To get a token quickly, create a read-only token at https://huggingface.co/settings/tokens and set it as HF_TOKEN.
conda activate sgi
python task_1_deep_research/step_1_get_answer.py gpt-5.2-pro
python task_1_deep_research/step_2_score.py gpt-5.2-proconda create -n idea python=3.10.18
conda activate idea
pip install -r task_2_idea_generation/idea_generation_requirements.txtconda activate idea
python task_2_idea_generation/step_1_get_answer.py gpt-5.2-pro
python task_2_idea_generation/step_2_score.py gpt-5.2-proconda create -n dryexp python=3.10.18
conda activate dryexp
pip install -r task_3_dry_experiment/dry_experiment_requirements.txtconda activate sgi
python task_3_dry_experiment/step_1_build.pyNote: If some scripts time out during execution, please enter the corresponding folder and manually run the script to complete the data initialization.
conda activate sgi
python task_3_dry_experiment/step_2_get_answer.py gpt-5.2-pro
python task_3_dry_experiment/step_3_run_code.py gpt-5.2-pro
python task_3_dry_experiment/step_4_score.py gpt-5.2-proconda activate sgi
python task_3_wet_experiment/step_1_get_answer.py gpt-5.2-pro
python task_3_wet_experiment/step_2_score.py gpt-5.2-proconda activate sgi
python task_4_experimental_reasoning/step_1_get_answer.py gpt-5.2-pro
python task_4_experimental_reasoning/step_2_score.py gpt-5.2-proconda activate sgi
python sgi_score.py gpt-5.2-pro💬 GitHub Issues: Please open an issue for bug reports or feature requests
📧 Email: xu_wanghan@sjtu.edu.cn
🤝 Community:
If you would like to cite our work, please use the following BibTeX.
@article{xu2025probing,
title={Probing Scientific General Intelligence of LLMs with Scientist-Aligned Workflows},
author={Xu, Wanghan and Zhou, Yuhao and Zhou, Yifan and Cao, Qinglong and Li, Shuo and Bu, Jia and Liu, Bo and Chen, Yixin and He, Xuming and Zhao, Xiangyu and others},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16969},
year={2025}
}If you find this work helpful, please consider to star⭐ this repo. Thanks for your support! 🤩
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |