| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
looks good but the build seems to be broken. Also wondering whether 1.20.0 would be a better target version since the changes are all small improvements but not fixes
Sorry, something went wrong.
Add binskim scan directory
Also publish nupkg directly from signed directory
and don't publish the out directory, publishing the signed directory is enough
Fix up path for binskim
Also try to publish just the nupkg
|
I've rebased to be up to date. Christoph Bergmeister (@bergmeister), Rob Holt (@rjmholt), Sydney Smith (@SydneyhSmith) - Chris is suggesting that our next release should perhaps be number 1.20.0 and I wanted everyone to have a chance to provide an opinion. FWIW, I'm ok with 1.20 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM -- agree that 1.20 seems good
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
looks about right to me
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Generally looks good, just a small comment about the Write-Host invocations
Sorry, something went wrong.
Co-authored-by: Robert Holt <rjmholt_msft@outlook.com>
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
PR Summary
The infrastructure at MS has changed with regard to signing, this PR allows us to use it.
PR Checklist