| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Christoph Bergmeister (@bergmeister) - 👋 Can I get a review please? Sorry I didn't see a way to add a reviewer myself 😊 Thanks! |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good overall, just a few comments. Not sure on the rule name though, it's definitely rather exclamation mark and not exclamation point. Maybe even as short as ExclaimOperator, since that is the name of the token.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Co-authored-by: Christoph Bergmeister <c.bergmeister@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Christoph Bergmeister <c.bergmeister@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Christoph Bergmeister <c.bergmeister@gmail.com>
|
Renamed rule from AvoidExclamationPointOperator to AvoidExclaimOperator |
Sorry, something went wrong.
…amed loop variable for clarity
|
Christoph Bergmeister (@bergmeister) - Thanks for your feedback so far - really helpful 😀. Was there anything else that needs to change for this to be considered for a merge? Anyone else I should be asking for a review from? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Added James as well to review. Other than that I just want to test drive it a bit myself for some exploratory testing as the rule is disabled by default so wouldn't get exercised as part of existing test suite scenarios |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Any news on this? I don't really know what my expectations should be, as this is my first contribution to this project - so please feel free to tell me to cool my jets and just be more patient. I appreciate this PR doesn't introduce some killer feature that will be used by loads of people - but I'm excited for it and don't want the PR to be abandoned. Equally I'm excited to pick up other issues and open more PRs to improve the tool and my own c#, after testing the waters here. Is there anything I can do to help? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Sorry for the delay Liam Peters (@liamjpeters) . It's not a bumper feature but because it can run on any PowerShell code, it's easy to miss a case that could result e.g. in a NullReferenceException. But the feature is not enabled by default, which is great to limit blast radius. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Christoph Bergmeister (@bergmeister) - Good idea to run it on a more complex test file. I've run the existing and updated PSSA against the Powershell project's build file. No exceptions thrown and no difference in execution time (both take an average of 170ms on my machine over multiple runs - even with my additional rule enabled). Invoke-ScriptAnalyzer -Path .\build.psm1 -Settings @{Rules = @{ 'PSAvoidExclaimOperator' = @{ Enable = $true }}}The build file has a mix of usages of -not and ! so is a good candidate. Using a text search there are 33 instances of the "!" character, 9 of them are within strings or comments (leaving 24 being used as negation). PSSA with the rule enabled correctly flags the 24 negation instances. Calling Invoke-ScriptAnalyzer with -Fix correctly changes the 24 negation instances. Anything else you can think I should check - please let me know. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Add a rule to warn about using the exclamation mark (!) as the negation operator. Suggests using -not instead.
PR Summary
Add the PSAvoidExclaimOperator rule to warn about the use of ! for negation. The rule is disabled by default as many people see this as a stylistic preference. Covered by tests .Fixes #1826
PR Checklist