Merged
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
The variable shadowed `Base.in`, breaking the `one(in) in ⊗(out...)` check. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In test/symmetries/singletree.jl, a local variable named in shadowed Base.in, causing errors in the one(in) in ⊗(out...) check. Renamed to coupled.
Started causing issues in v1.13 only because the random seed changed, running a codepath that was previously never taken.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code