| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Synchronize DT with kernel v6.6-stm32mp-r2-rc6-preint5 Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com> Change-Id: I2c8ee8eaf1bd6094447a5f03b6e607155002c6a6
When this property is set, internal RCC clock is used for the RGMII 125MHz clock selection. Signed-off-by: Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com> Change-Id: Ibb48a3403696f17c1331ab4c119e78aa07b1ceb1 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.st.com/c/mpu/oe/st/u-boot/+/460024 Reviewed-by: Christophe ROULLIER <christophe.roullier@foss.st.com> ACI: CIBUILD <MDG-smet-aci-builds@list.st.com> Reviewed-by: Gatien CHEVALLIER <gatien.chevallier@st.com> ACI: CITOOLS <MDG-smet-aci-reviews@list.st.com> Tested-by: Gatien CHEVALLIER <gatien.chevallier@st.com> Reviewed-by: Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com> Tested-by: Christophe ROULLIER <christophe.roullier@foss.st.com> Domain-Review: Christophe ROULLIER <christophe.roullier@foss.st.com>
Some configs were missing in the stm32mp23_defconfig, preventing the platform to boot on M33TDCID flavor, mainly due to the missing mailbox configs. Change-Id: Ia82e839078bb1a04643085fc30f9bd5a738c7df2 Signed-off-by: Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@foss.st.com> Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.st.com/c/mpu/oe/st/u-boot/+/462648 ACI: CIBUILD <MDG-smet-aci-builds@list.st.com> ACI: CITOOLS <MDG-smet-aci-reviews@list.st.com> Domain-Review: Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com> Reviewed-by: Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
Add the BOOT alias1 section for internal memories for STM32MP23. Change-Id: I75f4545b5ea56fa3a8b7ca39fa0c4f98b97ba28c Signed-off-by: Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@foss.st.com> Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.st.com/c/mpu/oe/st/u-boot/+/462649 Reviewed-by: Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com> ACI: CIBUILD <MDG-smet-aci-builds@list.st.com> Domain-Review: Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
Add the display of STM32MP23 SoC revision Y or X. Change-Id: I0c6985bac72a13a9024c4de9bcb11ec4bf391c5f Signed-off-by: Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@foss.st.com> Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.st.com/c/mpu/oe/st/u-boot/+/462914 ACI: CITOOLS <MDG-smet-aci-reviews@list.st.com> Reviewed-by: Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com> Domain-Review: Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com> ACI: CIBUILD <MDG-smet-aci-builds@list.st.com>
Update version in Makefile to prepare the label v2023.10-stm32mp-r2 for OpenSTLinux V6.1.0 Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com> Change-Id: I475ea11aee2b76580a415bd703f09af0d52767e3
Comparing the SD card boot with the eMMC one, the DTS differs as follows: - fwu-mdata-store = <0x00000085>; + fwu-mdata-store = "/soc@0/bus@42080000/mmc@48230000"; In both cases, the U-Boot DTS loaded by tf-a-stm32mp at address 0x84400000 was obtained with the following commands: STM32MP> fdt addr 0x84400000 Working FDT set to 84400000 STM32MP> fdt print As shown in the diff, the working case (SD card) uses a numeric value, i.e. the phandle of the sdmmc1 node, while the eMMC case uses a path. This patch updates the fwu-mdata-store property to use the phandle instead of the path. Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
|
Hi Dario, Your issue has been entered in our internal bug database. It will be part of our next release v6.2.1 which will be released in june. Thanks for your patch. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Comparing the SD card boot with the eMMC one, the DTS differs as follows:
In both cases, the U-Boot DTS loaded by tf-a-stm32mp at address 0x84400000 was obtained with the following commands:
STM32MP> fdt addr 0x84400000
Working FDT set to 84400000
STM32MP> fdt print
As shown in the diff, the working case (SD card) uses a numeric value, i.e. the phandle of the sdmmc1 node, while the eMMC case uses a path. This patch updates the fwu-mdata-store property to use the phandle instead of the path.
Please do not submit a Pull Request via github. Our project makes use of
mailing lists for patch submission and review. For more details please
see https://u-boot.readthedocs.io/en/latest/develop/sending_patches.html
The only exception to this is in order to trigger a CI loop on Azure prior
to posting of patches.