it's nice to see the output But most users won't know what to look for
I feel we need to add a "score" as to how good the support is.
ie a nice green 100% support if all is good and messages, if support expected/desired, is missing

@pbearne Can you look at the screenshot again? Earlier I added a screenshot in the last line to indicate where I copied the code of checking WebP support from, but I saw how it can be mistaken as the output of the code, so I have uploaded the actual screenshot of output.

Do you still feel we need to show percentage-wise support? I think now since the user has a clear picture to see that they have an action to take here, I feel we don't need to show partial support indication.

I wouldn't call it critical. Kick it down to recommendations.

Nice work @kirtangajjar - code looks good, I'll give this a test.

This worked well in my testing!

After testing though, I feel like the notice belongs under "recommended improvements" instead of "critical issues". Having WebP support is nice to have, it isn't really critical.

@adamsilverstein Done. LMK if you find any additional changes.

@kirtangajjar I left one additional tiny suggestion on the text, then we can merge this. Thanks for your work here!

@adamsilverstein I've committed your suggestion. Thanks for giving it a second look!

👍🏼 Looks good, nice work @kirtangajjar - going to go ahead and merge this. We'll get another chance to review the exact wording when we propose this feature for core.