Every surface that names the publisher now says TranscriptAPI — the name users
actually recognise, and the name on the service they authenticate against.
Attributing the package to a studio name nobody has heard of only added a step
between "who made this" and "do I trust it".

Changed across all 9 places it appeared:
- author.name in plugin.json and the four per-client manifests
- owner.name and plugins[].author.name in both marketplace indexes
- interface.developerName in .codex-plugin/plugin.json
- metadata.publisher in skills/youtube/SKILL.md

Also corrected the README footer, which read "© 2026 Zero Point Studio d.o.o."
while LICENSE already read "Copyright (c) 2026 TranscriptAPI". Those two
disagreed before this change; the footer now matches the licence file, which is
the authoritative document of the two. This aligns an existing inconsistency
rather than making a new legal claim — if the d.o.o. entity should appear
anywhere, LICENSE is the place to decide that, not a centred <sub> tag.

Bumped to 1.1.1 across every manifest so the identity change is traceable to a
version rather than appearing silently. Left the skill's own metadata.version at
2.0.0 — its content and behaviour are unchanged.

Verified: ajv `valid` for both manifests; skills-ref 1/1; check_conformance.py
11/11; all JSON and YAML parse; zero remaining occurrences of "Zero Point"
anywhere in the repository.

Co-Authored-By: CRHQ <noreply@crhq.ai>