| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
- GitHub inline linting annotations. - Resolve pre-existing quotation issues. - Replace flake8 with ruff and monorepo configuration.
|
Hi, @kieran-ryan ! Thank you for this PR. I was thinking about switching to ruff myself. I had some positive experience with it previously. Please, give me a little bit more time to check everything is alright (at first glance, it seems so). I will post back soon! |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Absolutely @delatrie, much appreciated! I've applied the same within other Python test frameworks and tooling and have similarly found a positive experience.
I've aimed for parity with this pull request, and would be interested to raise a subsequent merge request for review to extend to further capabilities of ruff - which is where we see the larger benefit in terms of formatting, code quality improvements, updating to later language syntax, catching bugs, etc. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi, @kieran-ryan
I've checked one more time and see nothing wrong. Let's go forward with ruff.
Thank you!
Sorry, something went wrong.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Replace flake8 with ruff for linting Python code.
Context
See ruff's default configuration for documentation on default rule disparity with flake8.
Dropped legacy Jenkins linting configuration.