| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
| Name | Name | Last commit date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
AngularJS v1.x wrapper for PouchDB
A lightweight AngularJS (v1.x) service for PouchDB that:
Disclaimer: angular-pouchdb works by monkey patching PouchDB's public API. Your milage may vary.
Since PouchDB is asynchronous, you will often need to call $scope.$apply() before changes are reflected on the UI. For example:
angular.controller('MyCtrl', function($scope, $window) {
var db = $window.PouchDB('db');
db.get('id')
.then(function(res) {
// Binding may/may not be updated depending on whether a digest cycle has
// been triggered elsewhere as Angular is unaware that `get` has resolved.
$scope.one = res;
});
var db2 = $window.PouchDB('db2');
db.get('id')
.then(function(res) {
$scope.$apply(function() {
// Value has been bound within Angular's context, so a digest will be
// triggered and the DOM updated
$scope.two = res;
});
});
});Writing $scope.$apply each time is laborious and we haven't even mentioned exception handling or $digest already in progress errors.
angular-pouchdb handles $scope.$apply for you by wrapping PouchDB's promises with $q. You can then use its promises as you would with any Angular promise, including the .finally method (not in the Promises A+ spec).
angular.controller('MyCtrl', function($scope, pouchDB) {
var db = pouchDB('db');
db.get('id')
.then(function(res) {
// Update UI (almost) instantly
$scope.one = res;
})
.catch(function(err) {
$scope.err = err;
})
.finally(function() {
$scope.got = true;
});
});Put another way, angular-pouchdb is not required to integrate PouchDB and AngularJS; they can and do happily work together without it. However, angular-pouchdb makes it more convenient to do so.
Install angular-pouchdb via Bower:
bower install --save angular-pouchdbAdd pouchdb as a module dependency:
angular.module('app', ['pouchdb']);Inject the pouchDB service in your app:
angular.service('service', function(pouchDB) {
var db = pouchDB('name');
});From then on, PouchDB's standard promises API applies. For example:
angular.controller('MainCtrl', function($log, $scope, pouchDB) {
var db = pouchDB('dbname');
var doc = { name: 'David' };
function error(err) {
$log.error(err);
}
function get(res) {
if (!res.ok) {
return error(res);
}
return db.get(res.id);
}
function bind(res) {
$scope.doc = res;
}
db.post(doc)
.then(get)
.then(bind)
.catch(error);
});See examples for further usage examples.
angular-pouchdb decorates PouchDB event emitters (such as those used by replicate.{to,from}) with a .$promise property to make them more useful within Angular apps, per the following mapping:
| Event | Deferred method |
|---|---|
| change | .notify |
| paused | .notify |
| complete | .resolve |
| reject | .reject |
For example:
var db = pouchDB('test');
db.replicate.to('https://couch.example.com/remote').$promise
.then(null, null, function(progress) {
console.log('replication status', progress);
})
.then(function(result) {
console.log('replication resolved with', result);
})
.catch(function(reason) {
console.error('replication failed with', reason);
})
.finally(function() {
console.log('done');
});A hash of pouchDBMethod: decorator pairs, with arbitrary nesting. Defaults to POUCHDB_METHODS (a constant mapping PouchDB's core API).
Example:
pouchDBProvider.methods = {
get: 'qify',
replicate: 'replicate'
};A service containing decorator functions used to wrap PouchDB's. By default, this includes qify, eventEmitter and replicate.
Since they're contained in a service, they can be substituted per standard dependency injection semantics, or reused outside of angular-pouchdb.
angular-pouchdb only wraps PouchDB's core API by default. If you need to wrap other methods (for example, one exposed by a PouchDB plugin), there are (at least) two strategies:
If the method exists synchronously, add the method name to pouchDBProvider.methods in an angular.config block, for example:
.config(function(pouchDBProvider, POUCHDB_METHODS) {
// Example for nolanlawson/pouchdb-authentication
var authMethods = {
login: 'qify',
logout: 'qify',
getUser: 'qify'
};
pouchDBProvider.methods = angular.extend({}, POUCHDB_METHODS, authMethods);
})If the method is added after instantiation asynchronously (perhaps via a promise), manually apply a decorator to the instance, for example:
.controller('myCtrl', function(pouchDB, pouchDBDecorators) {
// Example for nolanlawson/pouchdb-find
var db = pouchDB('db');
db.find = pouchDBDecorators.qify(db.find);
});Debugging angular-pouchdb in a console can be done by first retrieving the injector and calling the pouchDB service as normal, e.g.:
var pouchDB = angular.element(document.body).injector().get('pouchDB');
var db = pouchDB('mydb');
db.get('id').then();For further tips and tricks, see CouchDB Best Practices.
Yes! For example:
require('angular').module('app', [
require('angular-pouchdb')
]);Yes, though you need to use expose-loader to ensure PouchDB is available as a global, for example:
require('expose?PouchDB!pouchdb');Note: some (or all) parts of this section may be incorrect or misleading. Your input is welcome.
In short, AngularJS uses a different task scheduler than native promises.
Promises can be implemented differently. PouchDB uses native (A+-compliant) promises (or lie in environments without native support). Native promises are scheduled using "the microtask queue". AngularJS uses its own promise implementation; $q, which are scheduled via $evalAsync.
During normal use, PouchDB's (wrapped) promise is resolved correctly. However during testing, suites that use ngMock (angular-mocks) often unexpectedly timeout.
Typically, $rootScope.$apply() is used to propagate promise resolution in asynchronous tests. This triggers a digest cycle, which in turn flushes Angular's asyncQueue. Whilst this resolves $q promises, it does not resolve PouchDB's native promises, hence causing the test runner (e.g. Karma) to timeout.
Until Angular's promise implementation is decoupled from its digest cycle and/or Angular-specific implementations can be swapped out with their native equivalents, there are a few known workarounds:
ngMock modifies Angular's deferred implementation in order to support writing tests in a synchronous manner. Arguably, this simplifies control flow, but comes at the cost of making $q-wrapped promises difficult to test.
One workaround (and the one that angular-pouchdb currently uses) is to not use ngMock and manually handle $injector, for example:
describe('Working $q.when tests', function() {
var pouchdb;
beforeEach(function() {
// Note, `ngMock` would usually inject `ng` for us
var $injector = angular.injector(['ng', 'test']);
var pouchDB = $injector.get('pouchdb');
pouchdb = pouchDB('db');
});
it('should resolve a promise', function(done) {
pouchdb.info()
.then(function(info) {
expect(info).toBeDefined();
})
.finally(done);
});
});This preserves "normal" promise resolution behaviour, but will not suit all scenarios, such as when you need the additional introspection/async control features ngMock provides e.g. $httpBackend.flush.
Calling $rootScope.$apply in quick succession to cause a near-continuous digest cycle forces promise resolution. This appears to be due to tight coupling between Angular's promises and its digest cycle.
it('should wrap destroy', function(done) {
// Note, you might want to experiement with a interval timeout here
var interval = $window.setInterval($rootScope.$apply.bind());
db.destroy()
.then(shouldBeOK)
.then($window.clearInterval.bind(null, interval))
.catch(shouldNotBeCalled)
.finally(done);
})Note, this is likely to significantly decrease your test's performance.
No and it doesn't need to! Angular v2's concept of change detection completely differs to Angular v1's; the digest cycle, $scope.$apply and friends are no more. Just use PouchDB directly.
Released under the MIT License.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |