| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.20 #11687 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 16.17% 16.17% -0.01%
Complexity 13297 13297
============================================
Files 5656 5656
Lines 498151 498151
Branches 60441 60441
============================================
- Hits 80589 80587 -2
- Misses 408589 408591 +2
Partials 8973 8973
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 15105 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-14400)
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 15136 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-14417)
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm. didn't test.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
Tested, resolves the reported issue.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
merging based on approvals and manual test by @rajujith thanks all |
Sorry, something went wrong.
…pache#11687) * KVM: fix delete vm snapshot if it does not exist with a Stopped vm * update 11687
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Description
This PR fixes #11673
Steps to reproduce the issue
Prior to this PR
2025-09-19T12:14:05,455 DEBUG [utils.script.Script] (Script-7:[]) (logid:) Piped commands executed successfully 2025-09-19T12:14:05,455 DEBUG [utils.script.Script] (AgentRequest-Handler-2:[]) (logid:) Executing command [/usr/bin/qemu-img snapshot -d i-2-23-VM_VS_20250919102815 /mnt/92a06402-16ab-35e8-950e-d84499c5e942/57c64582-aa4b-4329-bf18-9bcb14dffd57 ]. 2025-09-19T12:14:05,594 WARN [utils.script.Script] (AgentRequest-Handler-2:[]) (logid:) Execution of process [983177] for command [/usr/bin/qemu-img snapshot -d i-2-23-VM_VS_20250919102815 /mnt/92a06402-16ab-35e8-950e-d84499c5e942/57c64582-aa4b-4329-bf18-9bcb14dffd57 ] failed. 2025-09-19T12:14:05,594 DEBUG [utils.script.Script] (AgentRequest-Handler-2:[]) (logid:) Exit value of process [983177] for command [/usr/bin/qemu-img snapshot -d i-2-23-VM_VS_20250919102815 /mnt/92a06402-16ab-35e8-950e-d84499c5e942/57c64582-aa4b-4329-bf18-9bcb14dffd57 ] is [1]. 2025-09-19T12:14:05,594 WARN [utils.script.Script] (AgentRequest-Handler-2:[]) (logid:) Process [983177] for command [/usr/bin/qemu-img snapshot -d i-2-23-VM_VS_20250919102815 /mnt/92a06402-16ab-35e8-950e-d84499c5e942/57c64582-aa4b-4329-bf18-9bcb14dffd57 ] encountered the error: [1]. 2025-09-19T12:14:05,595 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] (AgentRequest-Handler-2:[]) (logid:) Seq 1-8671962557478622109: { Ans: , MgmtId: 32986372244225, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, [{"com.cloud.agent.api.DeleteVMSnapshotAnswer":{"result":"false","details":"Delete VM Snapshot Failed due to can not remove snapshot from image file /mnt/92a06402-16ab-35e8-950e-d84499c5e942/57c64582-aa4b-4329-bf18-9bcb14dffd57 : 1","wait":"0","bypassHostMaintenance":"false"}}] }With this PR
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?