| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Fix and standardize one license header
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. @@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #12069 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 17.56% 17.56%
- Complexity 15539 15540 +1
=========================================
Files 5911 5911
Lines 529359 529359
Branches 64655 64655
=========================================
+ Hits 92979 92981 +2
+ Misses 425920 425919 -1
+ Partials 10460 10459 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@jbampton a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 15754 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Fix and standardize one license header
Fix and standardize one license header
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Fix and standardize one license header
Description
This PR uses pre-commit to auto add license headers to YAML files when they are missing.
So one step better that just checking for missing licenses with the rat pom check.
We are already doing this for Markdown files.
A bit more automation added
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
With pre-commit locally
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?