FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

realtime re-balance remote agents by DaanHoogland · Pull Request #14001 · apache/cloudstack · GitHub

realtime re-balance remote agents - #14001

Draft
DaanHoogland wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ghi9640-agent-lb-indirect-svm
Draft

realtime re-balance remote agents#14001
DaanHoogland wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ghi9640-agent-lb-indirect-svm

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

This PR relates to agent rebalancing on MSses see #9640 but applies to atachees .

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • Build/CI
  • Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

verify(clusteredAgentManagerImpl).loadDirectlyConnectedHost(hostVO, false);
}

// https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9640

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality
Suggested change
// https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9640

Comment on lines +1042 to +1046
// Indirectly connected agents (KVM hosts, SSVM, CPVM) dial in to a management server rather
// than being loaded directly by it, so this management server can't hand the host to a
// specific future owner the way it can for direct agents. Disconnect it instead: the agent
// reconnects on its own using its indirect agent LB configuration (the "host" global setting
// and indirect.agent.lb.algorithm), which is what actually determines its next owner.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

evaluate and redact comment

Comment on lines +158 to +160
// Indirectly connected agents (KVM hosts, SSVM, CPVM) dial in to a management server rather than
// being loaded directly by it, so they must be disconnected (and left to reconnect on their own)
// instead of going through the direct-agent rebalance dance that expects a ClusteredDirectAgentAttache.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality
Suggested change
// Indirectly connected agents (KVM hosts, SSVM, CPVM) dial in to a management server rather than
// being loaded directly by it, so they must be disconnected (and left to reconnect on their own)
// instead of going through the direct-agent rebalance dance that expects a ClusteredDirectAgentAttache.

Comment on lines +1040 to +1053
final AgentAttache attache = findAttache(hostId);
if (attache != null && !(attache instanceof ClusteredDirectAgentAttache)) {
// Indirectly connected agents (KVM hosts, SSVM, CPVM) dial in to a management server rather
// than being loaded directly by it, so this management server can't hand the host to a
// specific future owner the way it can for direct agents. Disconnect it instead: the agent
// reconnects on its own using its indirect agent LB configuration (the "host" global setting
// and indirect.agent.lb.algorithm), which is what actually determines its next owner.
logger.debug("Host id={} ({}) is an indirectly connected agent; disconnecting it so it reconnects and picks a management server " +
"using its own load balancing configuration", hostId, attache);
result = handleDisconnectWithoutInvestigation(attache, Event.AgentDisconnected, true, true);
finishRebalance(hostId, futureOwnerId, result ? Event.RebalanceCompleted : Event.RebalanceFailed);
return result;
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

new method, move comment to javadoc

codecov Bot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 3.41%. Comparing base (a7a293e) to head (0b0f83c).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (a7a293e) and HEAD (0b0f83c). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE
Flag BASE (a7a293e) HEAD (0b0f83c)
unittests 1 0
Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #14001       +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage     19.73%    3.41%   -16.33%     
=============================================
  Files          6371      487     -5884     
  Lines        575784    41863   -533921     
  Branches      70478     7912    -62566     
=============================================
- Hits         113644     1429   -112215     
+ Misses       449788    40234   -409554     
+ Partials      12352      200    -12152     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 3.41% <ø> (ø)
unittests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@nvazquez , can you have a look at this and discuss if needed?

This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL