Make AdoptOpenJDK Eclipse OpenJ9 the Java runtime for Java actions by Param-S · Pull Request #24 · apache/openwhisk-runtime-java · GitHub

Eclipse OpenJ9 runtime for Java is opensource runtime which is available as binary through AdoptOpenJDK community builds. By making available of the Eclipse OpenJ9 for OW Java actions, it gives the developers the option to choose between different Java runtime implementations.

Signed-off-by: Parameswaran Selvam sparameswara@gmail.com

We should replace the current image using oracle jdk and replcae the current java8action one with with this openjdk which uses ubuntu/debian based, transparent transition

+1

then we can close the other PR as this takes care of it ???

When I checked the docker hub of AdpotOpenJDK I just see adoptopenjdk/openjdk8-openj9, where are you getting this Adoptopenjdk/openjdk8-openj9:x86_64-ubuntu-jdk8u152-b16 from ?

Please refer the tags section https://hub.docker.com/r/adoptopenjdk/openjdk8-openj9/tags/

x86_64-ubuntu-jdk8u152-b16

@Param-S @csantanapr check this https://github.com/kameshsampath/adoptopenjdk , I have made the docker images temptable which right now builds JDK8/JDK9 for Centos/Debian using AdoptOpenJDK builds for both hotspot/openj9. This should reduce our maintenance much easier. WDYT?

@kameshsampath It will be useful. But, I think, we can have separate discussion as we may need to focus on less footprint images (like alpine based). We can have this discussion separately in issues, discuss on the need to support another distro, advantages & etc.

please replace current image do not create new one.

No need to change docker.gradle.
Please replace the current image in https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-runtime-java/blob/master/core/javaAction/Dockerfile

Just thought it is relevant to this discussion - Advantages with OpenJ9

@csantanapr made modification to make AdoptOpenJDK_EclipseOpenJ9 JDK image is the default for Java actions

actionContainers.JavaActionContainerTests > Java action should handle unicode in source, input params, logs, and result FAILED.

Looking at the failure

It could be related to locale and utf need to be set in env in the runtime

You’ll want to restore these.

I haven’t looked at the new dockerfile dependence below. If these aren’t set you’ll need to reset them.

Yep those are the ones I was referring 👍

Restored the locale specific environment variable settings.

Thanks @rabbah @csantanapr Restoring the environment variable solved the issue. All checks passed.

Just noticed you added the locales package here. Good belt-and-suspenders approach.

The latest OpenJ9 Docker images have now been marked as TCK certified, and so the Dont use in Production banner has been removed as well.

@Param-S Please use the tag jdk8u162-b12_openj9-0.8.0 (This is a multi-arch tag and works on x86_64, ppc64le and s390x)

Updated Docker file with latest AdoptOpenJDK TCK compliant docker build.

As I mentioned in my comment, use the jdk8u162-b12_openj9-0.8.0 tag rather than the x86_64-ubuntu-jdk8u162-b12_openj9-0.8.0

I’m working my way through a multi-architecture build for this. Is there a reason we feel the need to build the proxy JAR within the Docker image? My gut would be to build it once on the build machine and copy the resulting JAR onto the Docker image. Thoughts?

Running into the unicode failure again using jdk8u162-b12_openj9-0.8.0. The environment variables mentioned above are set in the runtime and also in the test compile environment. Any thoughts on additional potential causes?

@jonpspri which testcase fails with the latest Docker image.

@Param-S The same unicode test case as above. Hold tight — I seem to have some classpath issues and may not be running the correct test issues. Will be filing a PR over in incubator-openwhisk about that shortly.

I think I found my problem buried in a circular dependency on incubator-openwhisk for some of the core test classes, which means I was never sure what locale settings any given class was compiled under. I’m working on some separate PRs for that but it appears that the multi-architecture tag will give us a clean build and test on all architectures.

Found it. For whatever reason, the proxy was running using the ‘US-ASCII’ code page to log to the Docker log. Safest and most explicit resolution is to add ‘-Dfile.encoding=UTF-8’ to the CMD line. That way there’s no room for confusion.

Suggest also adding ‘-Dfile.encoding=UTF-8’. I think that may even do away with the need to use the locales apt package (though nothing is certain when it comes to locales.)

agree. I update the PR

LGTM

@Param-S could you rebase the PR?

Enable AdoptOpenJDK + Eclipse OpenJ9 JVM is the Java runtime for OpenWhisk Java actions. Signed-off-by: Parameswaran Selvam <sparameswara@gmail.com>

@csantanapr rebased the PR.

Param-S mentioned this pull request Mar 5, 2018

Provide Eclipse OpenJ9 as alternative Java runtime for OW java action #22

Closed

csantanapr reviewed Mar 5, 2018

View reviewed changes

kameshsampath mentioned this pull request Mar 5, 2018

Rebase OW JavaRuntime to use OpenJDK 8 #18

Closed

kameshsampath reviewed Mar 6, 2018

View reviewed changes

kameshsampath mentioned this pull request Mar 7, 2018

Multiple Distros for Java Runtimes #26

Open

csantanapr requested changes Mar 7, 2018

View reviewed changes

Param-S force-pushed the SupportAdoptOpenJDKEclipseOpenJ9 branch from 7adbbce to 32ab6ba Compare March 12, 2018 13:53

Param-S changed the title AdoptOpenJDK Eclipse OpenJ9 as alternative Java runtime Make AdoptOpenJDK Eclipse OpenJ9 the Java runtime for Java actions Mar 12, 2018

rabbah reviewed Mar 13, 2018

View reviewed changes

Param-S force-pushed the SupportAdoptOpenJDKEclipseOpenJ9 branch from 32ab6ba to 9589f83 Compare March 13, 2018 11:54

Param-S force-pushed the SupportAdoptOpenJDKEclipseOpenJ9 branch 2 times, most recently from 45bd5c9 to a9289f6 Compare March 16, 2018 08:23

dinogun reviewed Mar 16, 2018

View reviewed changes

Param-S force-pushed the SupportAdoptOpenJDKEclipseOpenJ9 branch from a9289f6 to c05de88 Compare March 16, 2018 10:59

jonpspri reviewed Mar 21, 2018

View reviewed changes

Param-S force-pushed the SupportAdoptOpenJDKEclipseOpenJ9 branch from c05de88 to e842640 Compare March 22, 2018 11:41

csantanapr approved these changes Apr 5, 2018

View reviewed changes

AdoptOpenJDK Eclipse OpenJ9 the Java runtime for OpenWhisk Java actions

d55dc47

Enable AdoptOpenJDK + Eclipse OpenJ9 JVM is the Java runtime for OpenWhisk Java actions. Signed-off-by: Parameswaran Selvam <sparameswara@gmail.com>

Param-S force-pushed the SupportAdoptOpenJDKEclipseOpenJ9 branch from e842640 to d55dc47 Compare April 5, 2018 14:45

csantanapr merged commit aeda0a4 into apache:master Apr 16, 2018

Param-S mentioned this pull request Apr 26, 2018

Enable Class Data Sharing option for Java runtime #21

Closed

                   dockerRetries = project.hasProperty('dockerRetries') ? dockerRetries.toInteger() : 3
                   dockerBinary = project.hasProperty('dockerBinary') ? [dockerBinary] : ['docker']
                   dockerBuildArg = ['build']
+                  dockerFile = project.hasProperty('dockerFile') ? dockerFile : 'Dockerfile'

		@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
		FROM adoptopenjdk/openjdk8-openj9:x86_64-ubuntu-jdk8u152-b16

-              ENV LANG en_US.UTF-8
-              ENV LANGUAGE en_US:en
-              ENV LC_ALL en_US.UTF-8

		@@ -1,38 +1,23 @@
		FROM buildpack-deps:trusty-curl
		FROM adoptopenjdk/openjdk8-openj9:x86_64-ubuntu-jdk8u162-b12_openj9-0.8.0

+              	&& ./compileClassCache.sh
-              CMD ["java", "-jar", "/javaAction/build/libs/javaAction-all.jar"]
+              CMD ["java", "-Xshareclasses:cacheDir=/javaSharedCache,readonly", "-Xquickstart", "-jar", "/javaAction/build/libs/javaAction-all.jar"]

Make AdoptOpenJDK Eclipse OpenJ9 the Java runtime for Java actions by Param-S · Pull Request #24 · apache/openwhisk-runtime-java · GitHub

Make AdoptOpenJDK Eclipse OpenJ9 the Java runtime for Java actions - #24

Conversation

Param-S commented Mar 5, 2018

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

kameshsampath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Param-S commented Mar 6, 2018

Uh oh!

kameshsampath commented Mar 6, 2018

Uh oh!

Param-S commented Mar 7, 2018

Uh oh!

csantanapr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

dinogun commented Mar 8, 2018

Uh oh!

Param-S commented Mar 12, 2018

Uh oh!

Param-S commented Mar 13, 2018

Uh oh!

csantanapr commented Mar 13, 2018

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Param-S Mar 13, 2018 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

dinogun commented Mar 15, 2018

Uh oh!

Param-S commented Mar 16, 2018

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

jonpspri commented Mar 17, 2018

Uh oh!

jonpspri commented Mar 19, 2018

Uh oh!

Param-S commented Mar 20, 2018

Uh oh!

jonpspri commented Mar 20, 2018

Uh oh!

jonpspri commented Mar 21, 2018

Uh oh!

jonpspri commented Mar 21, 2018

Uh oh!

jonpspri Mar 21, 2018 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

csantanapr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

csantanapr commented Apr 5, 2018

Uh oh!

Param-S commented Apr 5, 2018

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Param-S Mar 13, 2018 •
edited
Loading

jonpspri Mar 21, 2018 •
edited
Loading