| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
… so a conflict does not leave earlier keys applied
…fix from axis_type_split
…o the hourangle format override works for non-interned degree units
…evious tick-placement implementation
… 1-d WCS by building the empty pixel array per pixel dimension
…mpty pixel input instead of the transposed (dims, N) shape
…efer to pixel coordinates instead of world coordinates
|
Thank you for your contribution to Astropy! 🌌 This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainers who will review this pull request of some common things to look for.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
… multiple intersections along one spine
…regexes so malformed formats raise ValueError instead of silently dropping precision
… of the coordinate native unit
…gridlines with fewer than three sample points
…der in auto_assign_coord_positions
…no consistent spine assignment exists
…Error in format_coord
…n one tick label is a prefix of the adjacent one
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
This PR is the result of an automated review with Claude Opus of the astropy.visualization.wcsaxes submodule. I asked it to keep fixes as simple as possible, keep commit messages concise, and I then reviewed each and every change in detail and iterated on these and dropped some of the fixes. I have included only what I consider non-controversial concise fixes in this PR.
For now I'll keep this as a draft to give me a chance to do another round of review, and to make sure the CI is passing (in particular the image tests). In addition, this will need changelog entries.
So to be clear, the fixes and tests were written by Claude, but I have reviewed every single line and take responsibility for the changes.