FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

release 2.0.0 by esarafianou · Pull Request #95 · auth0/node-xml-encryption · GitHub

release 2.0.0 - #95

Merged
esarafianou merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
release_v2
Jan 19, 2022
Merged

release 2.0.0#95
esarafianou merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
release_v2

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

  1. Prepares for release 2.0.0, which drops support for Node 8.
  2. Also updates package lock file to version 2 which is backwards compatible to version 1

esarafianou requested a review from a team as a code owner January 13, 2022 14:55
radekk previously approved these changes Jan 13, 2022

radekk left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

👍🏻

gkwang left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

Can we update this as well:

"node": ">=8"

gkwang commented Jan 13, 2022
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

nit: Also do we still want to keep the package-lock file since this is a library and considering it was removed in the previous PR?

Also updates package lock file to version 2; backwards compatible to
version 1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@gkwang was the package-lock file ever removed? Based on it's history here: https://github.com/auth0/node-xml-encryption/commits/master/package-lock.json, it's been around since Jan 2020.

forty commented Jan 14, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

My 2 cents since I'm around ;) having or not a package lock is a recurring debate in npm modules.

It can still make sense to lock the dependencies of libraries, if only for the dev ones, as it makes CI build more reproducible (ie the build won't start failing when there is no change in the repository).

The lock will have no impact on the users of the library as it's not included in the package, and they should do their own locking

gkwang left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

Sounds good. I think we can leave the package-lock around to make some of our tools happy.

esarafianou merged commit 28cc6f1 into master Jan 19, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL