FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

Feat: add taxonomy and term publish, unpublish, localize, and unlocalize support by reeshika-h · Pull Request #262 · contentstack/contentstack-management-java · GitHub

/ contentstack-management-java Public

Feat: add taxonomy and term publish, unpublish, localize, and unlocalize support - #262

Merged
reeshika-h merged 4 commits into
developmentfrom
feat/DX-9676-taxonomy-publish
Aug 24, 2026
ConversationCommits (4)ChecksFiles changed
Merged

Feat: add taxonomy and term publish, unpublish, localize, and unlocalize support#262
reeshika-h merged 4 commits into
developmentfrom
feat/DX-9676-taxonomy-publish

Conversation

reeshika-h commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Adds Taxonomy.publish() / Taxonomy.unpublish() (POST /taxonomies/publish / /unpublish), closing the parity gap with the JS SDK per DX-9676
  • Adds Taxonomy.localize() / Taxonomy.unlocalize() and Terms.localize() / Terms.unlocalize() for locale-scoped taxonomy/term operations
  • branch header passthrough works via the existing generic addHeader() mechanism, no new parameter needed
  • All six methods were live-verified end-to-end against a real stack (not just request-shape assertions) — publish/unpublish return real job_ids, localize/unlocalize round-trip cleanly (201 Created / 204 No Content) with zero residual changes to real data

Test plan

  • mvn clean test — UnitTestSuite: 245 tests, 0 failures; APISanityTestSuite: 219 tests, 0 failures
  • Live-verified publish/unpublish against a real taxonomy (200, real job_id)
  • Live-verified localize/unlocalize at both taxonomy and term level (create → 201, delete → 204, restore confirmed via fetch)
  • Fixed a pre-existing gap where TaxonomyTest.java (package-private) was never wired into UnitTestSuite and so never ran under mvn test

Out of scope

  • Term-level localize/unlocalize was added per follow-up request but is not yet covered in the original DX-9674 TRD text — flagging for TRD update if needed
  • Python/.NET/JS parity fixes from the TRD are not part of this PR (Java-only)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

feat: add taxonomy and term publish, unpublish, localize, and unlocal…
e31021d 
…ize support

Closes the parity gap with the JS SDK per DX-9676 by adding CMA taxonomy
publish/unpublish and taxonomy/term-level localize/unlocalize methods,
each live-verified against a real stack.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
reeshika-h requested a review from a team as a code owner July 28, 2026 06:09

github-actions Bot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 0 0 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 0 500 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 1000 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

OMpawar-21 previously approved these changes Jul 29, 2026
View reviewed changes

OMpawar-21 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

LGTM

This was referenced Aug 3, 2026
Closed
Closed
OMpawar-21 force-pushed the feat/DX-9676-taxonomy-publish branch from c66ec97 to 1a9a97b Compare August 7, 2026 12:59
OMpawar-21 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 7, 2026 12:59

snyk-io Bot commented Aug 7, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
✅ Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues
✅ Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues
✅ Code Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

OMpawar-21 dismissed stale reviews from aniket-shikhare-cstk and themself via e31021d August 11, 2026 13:58
OMpawar-21 force-pushed the feat/DX-9676-taxonomy-publish branch from 1a9a97b to e31021d Compare August 11, 2026 13:58
reeshika-h marked this pull request as draft August 18, 2026 06:39

github-actions Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 0 1 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 0 500 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 1000 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

ℹ️ Vulnerabilities Without Available Fixes (Informational Only)

The following vulnerabilities were detected but do not have fixes available (no upgrade or patch). These are excluded from failure thresholds:

  • Critical without fixes: 0
  • High without fixes: 1
  • Medium without fixes: 0
  • Low without fixes: 0

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

github-actions Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 0 1 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 0 500 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 1000 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

ℹ️ Vulnerabilities Without Available Fixes (Informational Only)

The following vulnerabilities were detected but do not have fixes available (no upgrade or patch). These are excluded from failure thresholds:

  • Critical without fixes: 0
  • High without fixes: 1
  • Medium without fixes: 0
  • Low without fixes: 0

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

chore: revert unrelated Snyk dependency edits from taxonomy commit
0e3fac5 
okhttp/gson/kotlin-stdlib version bumps were accidentally carried into
92fe404 via an uncommitted working-tree change during a branch switch.
They belong with the separate Snyk remediation work, not this release.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

github-actions Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 0 1 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 0 500 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 1000 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

ℹ️ Vulnerabilities Without Available Fixes (Informational Only)

The following vulnerabilities were detected but do not have fixes available (no upgrade or patch). These are excluded from failure thresholds:

  • Critical without fixes: 0
  • High without fixes: 1
  • Medium without fixes: 0
  • Low without fixes: 0

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

reeshika-h requested a review from OMpawar-21 August 24, 2026 06:32
reeshika-h marked this pull request as ready for review August 24, 2026 06:37
reeshika-h merged commit c579e7f into development Aug 24, 2026
9 checks passed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Show hidden characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

OMpawar-21 OMpawar-21 approved these changes
harshitha-cstk harshitha-cstk approved these changes
aniket-shikhare-cstk aniket-shikhare-cstk left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL