🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

Qualify these metrics as indicators, not measures of correctness.

Defect density and code coverage are quantifiable, but neither directly establishes functional correctness. Please describe them as indicators of functional quality and add supporting citations for the metric claims.

- metrics such as defect density measured per 
- thousand lines of code (KLOC), code coverage percentages, or pass/fail rates 
- of functional test suites provide clear, quantifiable measures of functional correctness. 
+ metrics such as defect density per thousand lines of code (KLOC), code coverage,
+ and functional-test pass rates provide quantifiable indicators of functional
+ quality, but none alone establishes functional correctness.

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@wp/sections/introduction.tex` around lines 27 - 29, Revise the metrics
discussion in the introduction around the examples of defect density, code
coverage, and functional test pass rates to describe these values as indicators
of functional quality rather than direct measures of functional correctness. Add
appropriate supporting citations for the claims about these metrics, while
preserving the surrounding discussion.

🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

# Locate the file and inspect the relevant section with line numbers.
git ls-files 'wp/sections/introduction.tex' 'wp/**/*.bib' 'wp/**/references*' | cat

echo
echo '--- introduction excerpt ---'
sed -n '1,120p' wp/sections/introduction.tex | cat -n

echo
echo '--- ISO 25010 bibliography references ---'
rg -n -C 2 'ISO25010|25010|ISO/IEC 25010' wp -g '*.bib' -g '*.tex'

Repository: cqfn/aibolit

Length of output: 6391

Use a source that supports the quantification claim
ISO/IEC 25010 defines the product quality model, but it doesn’t substantiate the comparison that maintainability is “less straightforward to formally specify or quantify.” Narrow the sentence to what the standard states, or add a source that explicitly contrasts maintainability with more directly measurable qualities.

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@wp/sections/introduction.tex` around lines 32 - 33, Revise the sentence
containing “maintainability is a lot less straightforward to formally specify or
quantify” so it only makes claims directly supported by ISO25010, or add a
citation that explicitly supports the comparison. Preserve the surrounding
discussion while removing or narrowing the unsupported quantification claim.

🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

# Inspect the target section with line numbers
sed -n '1,120p' wp/sections/introduction.tex | cat -n

# Find the Leveson citation entry and nearby bibliography context
rg -n "Leveson2011|Leveson" -S wp || true

Repository: cqfn/aibolit

Length of output: 5470

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

sed -n '1258,1272p' wp/references.bib | cat -n

Repository: cqfn/aibolit

Length of output: 518

Change “business domain” to “safety-critical systems”
Leveson’s book is about engineering safer systems and safety-critical applications, so the current wording overstates what the citation supports. Reword this sentence to match that context, or cite a source that discusses maintainability in the business domain.

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@wp/sections/introduction.tex` around lines 34 - 36, Update the sentence
around the Leveson2011 citation in the introduction to replace “business domain”
with wording about safety-critical systems or applications, preserving the
intended contrast with functional correctness and the existing citation.