chain::reflink_copy passed 0x40209409 as FICLONE. The real number is _IOW(0x94, 9, int) = 0x40049409. The kernel matches the full ioctl number, including the size field, so it answered ENOTTY. The fallback treats ENOTTY as "this filesystem has no reflink", so every call silently fell back to a full streamed copy: chain-assembly base memory, and the bake's rootfs baseline clone. That happened even on btrfs, XFS, and ZFS 2.2+.
Found by @jrimmer while measuring #321 (described in a comment there, but the change wasn't in that branch), so it lands on its own here.
Verification
On Ubuntu 22.04 / kernel 5.15, using an XFS loopback made with reflink=1 and a 200 MiB random source file:
0x40209409 -> ENOTTY
0x40049409 -> clone OK
df used: 240 MiB for src + clone (extents shared); cmp: content identical
A unit test pins the constant to its _IOW derivation.
0x40209409 encodes a 32-byte payload; FICLONE is _IOW(0x94, 9, int) =
0x40049409. The kernel answered ENOTTY, which the fallback reads as no
reflink, so every reflink_copy streamed a full copy on every
filesystem. Reported by @jrimmer in #321.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
chain::reflink_copy passed 0x40209409 as FICLONE. The real number is _IOW(0x94, 9, int) = 0x40049409. The kernel matches the full ioctl number, including the size field, so it answered ENOTTY. The fallback treats ENOTTY as "this filesystem has no reflink", so every call silently fell back to a full streamed copy: chain-assembly base memory, and the bake's rootfs baseline clone. That happened even on btrfs, XFS, and ZFS 2.2+.
Found by @jrimmer while measuring #321 (described in a comment there, but the change wasn't in that branch), so it lands on its own here.
Verification
On Ubuntu 22.04 / kernel 5.15, using an XFS loopback made with reflink=1 and a 200 MiB random source file:
A unit test pins the constant to its _IOW derivation.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code