| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is 87.30159% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2674 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 87.66% 91.34% +3.67%
==========================================
Files 245 245
Lines 49024 49082 +58
Branches 4313 4321 +8
==========================================
+ Hits 42979 44835 +1856
+ Misses 5310 3530 -1780
+ Partials 735 717 -18
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Minor comment
Sorry, something went wrong.
| self.exprs = exprs | ||
| self.cls = cls | ||
|
|
||
| # NOTE: Constructed lazyly at `__call__` time because `**kwargs` is |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo: "lazily"
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
fixed
Sorry, something went wrong.
| assert np.all(u.data == u1.data) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def test_buffer_reuse(): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is it worth also having a test to make sure that non-reusable buffers don't get reused, even when this option is enabled?
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
most tests already cover that in PRO
Sorry, something went wrong.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
No description provided.