| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues... but I did find this frog.
.--._.--.
( O O )
/ . . \
.`._______.'.
/( )\
_/ \ \ / / \_
.~ ` \ \ / / ' ~.
{ -. \ V / .- }
_ _`. \ | | | / .'_ _
>_ _} | | | {_ _<
/. - ~ ,_-' .^. `-_, ~ - .\
'-'|/ \|`-`| File Path | Reviewed |
|---|---|
| dfetch/commands/update.py | ✅ |
Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.
Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.
Korbit Guide: Usage and CustomizationInteracting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
- On any given comment that Korbit raises on your pull request, you can have a discussion with Korbit by replying to the comment.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings Issue Categories
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ✅
Category Enabled Documentation ✅ Logging ✅ Error Handling ✅ Readability ✅ Design ✅ Performance ✅ Security ✅ Functionality ✅ Feedback and Support
Note
Korbit Pro is free for open source projects 🎉
Sorry, something went wrong.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Fixes #684
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Relax the overlapping path check in the dfetch update command to ignore scenarios where a real path matches exactly with a destination or does not have any actual parent/child overlapping paths, and add relevant tests to ensure proper functionality.
Why are these changes being made?
The previous implementation erroneously flagged exact path matches as overlaps due to a strict common prefix logic, causing unnecessary warnings and process skips during updates. The new approach accurately identifies true overlapping paths by leveraging Path parent relationships and ensures only genuine overlaps are warned against, thus resolving issue #684 efficiently.