| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@spoorcc has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 36 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThis PR adds a new BDD feature for patch fuzzy matching and enhances test infrastructure. It includes documentation updates to reference patch scenarios, a new feature test file for fuzzy patch matching, and new step definitions supporting directory-aware patch file creation and remote repository modifications. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labelsdevelopment Suggested reviewers
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches 🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. ❤️ ShareComment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agentsIn `@dfetch/manifest/project.py`: - Around line 274-275: The SVN documentation block in project.py incorrectly includes the git-only feature file patch-fuzzy-matching.feature; either remove the line ".. scenario-include:: ../features/patch-fuzzy-matching.feature" from the SVN section or add a SVN-specific variant (e.g., ../features/patch-fuzzy-matching-svn.feature) that replaces git-specific steps like "a git repository" and "in git-repository" with SVN equivalents, and update the include to reference that new SVN variant; look for the existing SVN-related include lines (e.g., ".. scenario-include:: ../features/patch-after-fetch-svn.feature") to place or remove the reference accordingly. In `@features/patch-fuzzy-matching.feature`: - Around line 49-58: The step that creates the override patch is writing it to the wrong directory: change the Gherkin step "And the patch file 'SomeProject.patch' in SomeProject" so the patch is created under the manifest directory (i.e., in MyProject) instead of SomeProject; update the step fixture so the file path for the patch is MyProject/SomeProject.patch to ensure dfetch resolves the manifest-relative patch declared as patch: SomeProject.patch. - Around line 60-71: The test hardcodes the Dfetch version string; update the multisub patterns used by the check_output function so the dfetch_title regex is applied to replace version strings. In practice, import/Reference the existing dfetch_title regex (from generic_steps.py) and add it to the multisub list inside check_output (the multisub variable used in check_output) so version lines like "Dfetch (0.11.0)" are normalized along with existing substitutions for git hashes and timestamps.
Sorry, something went wrong.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests