| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. @@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #130 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 66.60% 66.60%
=======================================
Files 25 25
Lines 3171 3171
=======================================
Hits 2112 2112
Misses 1059 1059
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It is better if we can go with m2r2 rather than m2r which is no longer maintained. Do things build correctly if we do that?
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@sbillinge yes, I've tested it locally and the docs will still build correctly if we use m2r2. I've updated conf.py and the requirements folder to now use m2r2 instead of m2r. This is ready for review. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
What problem does this PR address?
In requirements/docs.txt, m2r is installed as a dependency when the docs are being built. However, docs/source/conf.py lists m2r2 instead of m2r as one of the extensions being used by Sphinx to build the docs. This causes an error when building the docs. This PR fixes this error by updating the conf.py extensions so it is in sync with the dependencies listed in requirements/docs.txt.
What should the reviewer(s) do?
Please review and merge.