Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: +0.13% 🎉

Comparison is base (715252a) 83.73% compared to head (2ee9c01) 83.87%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1770      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.73%   83.87%   +0.13%     
==========================================
  Files         136      136              
  Lines        9040     9041       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         7570     7583      +13     
+ Misses       1470     1458      -12     

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

... and 16 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@JoanFM I've added an initial implementation of the change to add a field description for attribute of Text document. Would love to hear your thoughts and more changes that are needed. Can the example attribute from Field have a multi-line example? Since for bytes I want to provide one of video or audio bytes which needs a multiple line example

Hello @punndcoder28 ,

Thanks for the contribution. However, we would need you to sign off the commit so that we can incorporate your improvements.

Sorry for that. The commits should be signed off now

@JoanFM What is the correct github flow? Should I rebase and keep my commits for a PR to a single commit? Or each change should be a different commit?

@JoanFM What is the correct github flow? Should I rebase and keep my commits for a PR to a single commit? Or each change should be a different commit?

As you want, eventually all the commits will be squashed into a single one, so your choice

To resolve the conflicts, make sure to add None as the default value for the Optional fields.

Also, the embedding example can be a list and should not be actually a text