FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

[release/9.0-staging] Transfer ThreadPool local queue to high-pri queue on Task blocking by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #109989 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub

Repository navigation

[release/9.0-staging] Transfer ThreadPool local queue to high-pri queue on Task blocking - #109989

Merged
mangod9 merged 1 commit into
release/9.0-stagingfrom
backport/pr-109841-to-release/9.0-staging
Nov 26, 2024
Merged

mangod9 merged 1 commit into
release/9.0-stagingfrom
backport/pr-109841-to-release/9.0-staging

Conversation

github-actions Bot commented Nov 19, 2024 •
edited by mangod9
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #109841 to release/9.0-staging

/cc @stephentoub

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

This is an experimental fix related #103984. Some 1p services that use a lot of sync-over-async are experiencing stalls due to some priority inversion issues in work items that get queued to the thread pool. In some situations, the services stall for a long time until a large number of worker threads are injected, which can take a long time. This change would help the app continue to make progress. This change (in addition addition to some app-level throttling to stop new items from being added to the request queue) should help with unblocking.

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

[If yes, specify when the regression was introduced. Provide the PR or commit if known.]

Testing

n/a. This is experimental to validate in production with the config set.

Risk

Low, the feature is behind a config flag

Added for now under the same config flag as is being used for other work prioritization experimentation.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @mangod9
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc: @mangod9

jeffschwMSFT added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Nov 20, 2024

jeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

lgtm. please get a code review. we will take for consideration in 9.0.x

jeffschwMSFT added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Nov 21, 2024
jeffschwMSFT added this to the 9.0.1 milestone Nov 25, 2024
mangod9 merged commit d955059 into release/9.0-staging Nov 26, 2024
github-actions Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 28, 2024
jkotas deleted the backport/pr-109841-to-release/9.0-staging branch December 29, 2024 15:49
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Threading Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL