| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: rafalzydowicz The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Hi @rafalzydowicz. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a feast-dev member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step. Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label. I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@rafalzydowicz are you still actively working on this rebase? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Yes, we are developing against it on our fork, but this PR is ready. The integration tests are failing, but they are failing on the v7 branch in general (unless I'm missing something) and the jupyter build push because the image isn't found. Would you want these all fixed on this branch? As an aside, considering your active development of spark on master, what is our goal with this PR? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Ok, well we will need to fix the tests then. Will keep it open for the time being.
Two reasons to get this merged in.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@woop, docker build is still failing because it can't find images on docker.io. This may be related to a bug with buildkit mentioned at the bottom of https://docs.docker.com/develop/develop-images/build_enhancements/. Can you please have a look? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Thanks @rafalzydowicz. Will take a look as soon as we get through the 0.8 release. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@rafalzydowicz: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR adds support for databricks integration. On the server side, this means a new DatabricksJobManager. There have been minor changes to some common classes and extraction of some others to common modules to avoid unwanted beam dependencies leaking into our Spark jars. Otherwise, most changes are contained under spark and databricks folders. On the python client side, we have added support for azure data lake storage for the staging location. It requires a AZURE_CLIENT_ID, AZURE_TENANT_ID, and AZURE_CLIENT_SECRET. We are in the process of implementing device code flows for a few future release.
There is also a databricks emulator, or facade really, which provides a databricks API layer and runs Spark locally. It's not currently being used in our testing.
Ingestion metric naming conventions along with tags have been retained, with slightly altered prefixes on account of Spark source names and executor identifiers. We continued to use the original StatsdReporter and massaged the naming to allow tags to be included. Only Inflight and Deadletter metrics are currently implemented.
We are aware that v0.8 has a new Spark implementation, which is why we are merging this against v0.7.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
No API changes