| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
The full debug x flush x pickle x level x algo x http2 matrix ran identical assertions 192 times. The compression-relevant dimensions (level x algo x http2) stay fully crossed; debug/flush/pickle rotate through cases so every value is still exercised.
…4 -> 22) Keep every distinct truthy/falsy word plus one mixed-case variant per result class; the exhaustive table re-tested the same .lower() path.
… only test_proxy 42->24, test_socks_proxy 18->10. Proxy resolution is protocol-independent; each distinct scenario is still exercised.
env_to_bool parsing is exhaustively tested in test_utils; keep one case per precedence arm (incl. config=False with env unset).
… tables (9 -> 5 rows)
… ignore_spans rows
…moved the exact duplicate escaped-regex should_propagate_trace parameter case; the unescaped regex asserts identical matching behavior.
Result: {"status":"keep","test_count":2314,"runtime_s":122.32,"covered_lines":9779,"covered_branches":2781,"coverage_pct":37.503,"failed":0,"skipped":171}
…ault value (2); the unset case already asserts the same default branch, while the non-default override remains covered.
Result: {"status":"keep","test_count":2313,"runtime_s":122.86,"covered_lines":9779,"covered_branches":2781,"coverage_pct":37.503,"failed":0,"skipped":171}
…x substring matching is unchanged by the URL scheme, and the retained HTTP localhost case asserts the same positive match.
Result: {"status":"keep","test_count":2312,"runtime_s":122.21,"covered_lines":9779,"covered_branches":2781,"coverage_pct":37.503,"failed":0,"skipped":171}
…tain coverage of negative and boundary invalid inputs through the same max_size <= 0 rejection.
Result: {"status":"keep","test_count":2311,"runtime_s":123.61,"covered_lines":9779,"covered_branches":2781,"coverage_pct":37.503,"failed":0,"skipped":171}
… all non-string, non-list values follow the same no-op return path while None, integer, and boolean representatives remain.
Result: {"status":"keep","test_count":2310,"runtime_s":121.46,"covered_lines":9779,"covered_branches":2781,"coverage_pct":37.503,"failed":0,"skipped":171}
…some$' fail against 'some-string' under the default end-anchor behavior, while positive, case-sensitive, and explicit-anchor cases remain.
Result: {"status":"keep","test_count":2309,"runtime_s":120.8,"covered_lines":9779,"covered_branches":2781,"coverage_pct":37.503,"failed":0,"skipped":171}
… skip the matcher loop and return False independently of item, while empty-string and non-empty-item representatives remain.
Result: {"status":"keep","test_count":2308,"runtime_s":121.5,"covered_lines":9779,"covered_branches":2781,"coverage_pct":37.503,"failed":0,"skipped":171}
…list return occurs before item inspection, while empty-string and ordinary-string representatives remain.
Result: {"status":"keep","test_count":2307,"runtime_s":120.78,"covered_lines":9779,"covered_branches":2781,"coverage_pct":37.503,"failed":0,"skipped":171}
…the retained empty-string case covers the same loop-skipping False result, while ordinary-string behavior remains covered with regex_list=None and nonempty matchers.
Result: {"status":"keep","test_count":2306,"runtime_s":121.11,"covered_lines":9779,"covered_branches":2781,"coverage_pct":37.503,"failed":0,"skipped":171}
…retain both inclusive numeric boundaries, while True and False retain boolean coercion behavior.
Result: {"status":"keep","test_count":2305,"runtime_s":123.16,"covered_lines":9779,"covered_branches":2781,"coverage_pct":37.503,"failed":0,"skipped":171}
…retained empty-string None-list case covers the same early False return before item inspection.
Result: {"status":"keep","test_count":2304,"runtime_s":121.11,"covered_lines":9779,"covered_branches":2781,"coverage_pct":37.503,"failed":0,"skipped":171}
… boolean acceptance, and numeric zero independently preserves the False-coerced boundary outcome.
Result: {"status":"keep","test_count":2303,"runtime_s":122.01,"covered_lines":9779,"covered_branches":2781,"coverage_pct":37.503,"failed":0,"skipped":171}
…t already creates an empty cache and asserts get() returns None, exercising the same miss behavior before validating a subsequent hit.
Result: {"status":"keep","test_count":2302,"runtime_s":123.18,"covered_lines":9779,"covered_branches":2781,"coverage_pct":37.503,"failed":0,"skipped":171}
…perset: it asserts the same empty-cache miss and first set/get, then additionally validates overwriting an existing entry.
Result: {"status":"keep","test_count":2301,"runtime_s":123.54,"covered_lines":9779,"covered_branches":2781,"coverage_pct":37.503,"failed":0,"skipped":171}
… exercises the identical existing-key update branch and resulting retrieval assertion; cache capacity is irrelevant before eviction.
Result: {"status":"keep","test_count":2300,"runtime_s":122.33,"covered_lines":9779,"covered_branches":2781,"coverage_pct":37.503,"failed":0,"skipped":171}
…ed current-scope test covers both the None and assigned-span outcomes and exercises the public no-argument API.
Result: {"status":"keep","test_count":2299,"runtime_s":123.34,"covered_lines":9779,"covered_branches":2781,"coverage_pct":37.503,"failed":0,"skipped":171}
Codecov Results 📊✅ 94982 passed | ⏭️ 6343 skipped | Total: 101325 | Pass Rate: 93.74% | Execution Time: 336m 13s 📊 Comparison with Base Branch
All tests are passing successfully. ✅ Patch coverage is 100.00%. Project has 2511 uncovered lines. @@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #PR +/-##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.92% 89.89% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 193 193 —
Lines 24832 24832 —
Branches 8912 8912 —
==========================================
+ Hits 22328 22321 -7
- Misses 2504 2511 +7
- Partials 1415 1415 —Generated by Codecov Action |
Sorry, something went wrong.
| "https://example.com", | ||
| True, | ||
| ), # to show escaping is not needed | ||
| ([r"https://.*"], "https://example.com", True), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The 2nd test case removed here served more as documentation rather than exercising a specific code path.
Could add it back in for that reason, but the LLM removed it because it considered it a duplicate test.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
…#6972) May try this on individual integrations later, but used the autoresearch skill to collapse tests where possible, remove dead ones, etc. Went from 2720 -> 2289 tests Refs PY-2641
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
May try this on individual integrations later, but used the autoresearch skill to collapse tests where possible, remove dead ones, etc.
Went from 2720 -> 2289
Refs PY-2641