FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

CI: Update CodeQL Action test to use `setup-codeql` by henrymercer · Pull Request #3524 · github/codeql-action · GitHub

CI: Update CodeQL Action test to use setup-codeql - #3524

Merged
henrymercer merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
henrymercer/checks-use-setup-codeql
Feb 27, 2026
Merged

CI: Update CodeQL Action test to use setup-codeql#3524
henrymercer merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
henrymercer/checks-use-setup-codeql

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This saves a bit of unnecessary work creating databases that we don't need.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 27, 2026 16:16
henrymercer requested a review from a team as a code owner February 27, 2026 16:16
github-actions Bot added the size/S Should be easy to review label Feb 27, 2026
mbg previously approved these changes Feb 27, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

Pull request overview

Updates the repository’s CI workflow to determine CodeQL tool versions using the lighter-weight setup-codeql action, avoiding unnecessary database creation during version comparison.

Changes:

  • Replace dual ./init runs (and database cleanup) with two ./setup-codeql runs (default vs tools: linked).
  • Update the version-compare step to use setup-codeql outputs and compare default vs linked bundle versions.

henrymercer disabled auto-merge February 27, 2026 16:29
henrymercer added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 27, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 0ec47d0 Feb 27, 2026
247 of 248 checks passed
henrymercer deleted the henrymercer/checks-use-setup-codeql branch February 27, 2026 17:23
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size/S Should be easy to review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL