FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

Don't run update release branch workflow on forks. by chrisgavin · Pull Request #400 · github/codeql-action · GitHub

Don't run update release branch workflow on forks. - #400

Merged
chrisgavin merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
no-update-release-branch-on-forks
Feb 24, 2021
Merged

chrisgavin merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
no-update-release-branch-on-forks

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Merge / deployment checklist

  • Confirm this change is backwards compatible with existing workflows.
  • Confirm the readme has been updated if necessary.

robertbrignull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

Seems reasonable as forks shouldn't need to use this workflow, but at the same time it's not harmful. Should the same change be applied to some of the other more "operational" workflows, e.g. check-expected-release-files, release-runner, split, update-supported-enterprise-server-versions?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The main reason that I modified this workflow specifically is that it creates a PR that mentions everyone who's contributed to the repository. In general I don't think we mind if people are running the other workflows, even if it is a bit pointless.

chrisgavin merged commit 964ae01 into main Feb 24, 2021
chrisgavin deleted the no-update-release-branch-on-forks branch February 24, 2021 09:28
github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Mar 1, 2021
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL