FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

Graduate overlay-aware CodeQL version selection by henrymercer · Pull Request #4246 · github/codeql-action · GitHub

Repository navigation

Graduate overlay-aware CodeQL version selection - #4246

Merged
henrymercer merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
henrymercer/graduate-overlay-version-match
Oct 22, 2026
Merged

henrymercer merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
henrymercer/graduate-overlay-version-match

Conversation

henrymercer commented Oct 16, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Graduate overlay_analysis_match_codeql_version and remove the overlay_analysis_match_codeql_version_dry_run dry run, along with the telemetry diagnostic added for it. Also, as a small optimisation, skip listing the Actions cache when only one default CodeQL version is enabled, since there is only one CodeQL version to choose in this case. This includes GHES, since there are no feature flags and therefore only one CodeQL version will ever be enabled there.

Risk assessment

For internal use only. Please select the risk level of this change:

  • Low risk: Changes are fully under feature flags, or have been fully tested and validated in pre-production environments and are highly observable, or are documentation or test only.

Which use cases does this change impact?

Workflow types:

  • Advanced setup - Impacts users who have custom CodeQL workflows.
  • Managed - Impacts users with dynamic workflows (Default Setup, Code Quality, ...).

Products:

  • Code Scanning - The changes impact analyses when analysis-kinds: code-scanning.

Environments:

  • Dotcom - Impacts CodeQL workflows on github.com and/or GitHub Enterprise Cloud with Data Residency.

How did/will you validate this change?

  • Unit tests - I am depending on unit test coverage (i.e. tests in .test.ts files).

If something goes wrong after this change is released, what are the mitigation and rollback strategies?

  • Rollback - Change can only be disabled by rolling back the release or releasing a new version with a fix.

How will you know if something goes wrong after this change is released?

  • Telemetry - I rely on existing telemetry or have made changes to the telemetry.

Are there any special considerations for merging or releasing this change?

  • No special considerations - This change can be merged at any time.

Merge / deployment checklist

  • Confirm this change is backwards compatible with existing workflows.
  • Consider adding a changelog entry for this change.
  • Confirm the readme and docs have been updated if necessary.

henrymercer and others added 2 commits October 16, 2026 14:01
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI max review requested due to automatic review settings October 16, 2026 13:21
github-actions Bot added the size/L May be hard to review label Oct 16, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

Warning

  • Copilot's review of this pull request may be incomplete because some of the changed files are excluded by your Copilot content exclusion settings. See Excluding content from Copilot for details.

🔵 Needs a closer look

A maintainer should confirm rollout readiness before removing the feature-flag kill switch.

1 open finding What changed in this PR

Graduates overlay-aware default CodeQL version selection for eligible Code Scanning pull requests.

Changes:

  • Removes feature flags, dry-run behavior, and diagnostic telemetry.
  • Skips cache lookup on GHES and when only one default version is enabled.
  • Updates regression coverage for selection eligibility.
File Description
src/​setup-codeql.ts Graduates selection and adds cache-lookup guards.
src/​setup-codeql.test.ts Covers supported environments and bypass conditions.
src/​feature-flags.ts Removes selection and dry-run flags.
Files excluded by content exclusion policy (1)
  • lib/entry-points.js

🧠 Review effort: Max


💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment thread src/setup-codeql.ts Resolved
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
henrymercer marked this pull request as ready for review October 16, 2026 14:08
henrymercer requested a review from a team as a code owner October 16, 2026 14:08
…overlay-version-match

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
mbg previously approved these changes Oct 21, 2026

mbg left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

The changes make sense and thanks for the explanation of the drive-by improvement in the PR description. Just one minor comment about the rather large condition in getEnabledVersionsWithOverlayBaseDatabases.

Comment thread src/setup-codeql.ts Resolved
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
mbg previously approved these changes Oct 22, 2026

mbg left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

Thanks for simplifying / documenting that!

…overlay-version-match

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
henrymercer added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 22, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit bdadc03 Oct 22, 2026
228 checks passed
henrymercer deleted the henrymercer/graduate-overlay-version-match branch October 22, 2026 13:08
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size/L May be hard to review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL