| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
|
Even though using the JS produced by tsc makes more sense, this neither gives us any benefit in build time nor bundle size: main$ npm run build $ rm -r lib build $ time npm run build npm run build 5.48s user 0.44s system 143% cpu 4.126 total $ du -d1 -h lib 6.8M lib this branch$ npm run build $ rm -r lib build $ time npm run build npm run build 5.48s user 0.47s system 143% cpu 4.147 total $ du -d1 -h lib 7.4M lib |
Sorry, something went wrong.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Risk assessment
For internal use only. Please select the risk level of this change:
Which use cases does this change impact?
Workflow types:
Products:
Environments:
How did/will you validate this change?
If something goes wrong after this change is released, what are the mitigation and rollback strategies?
How will you know if something goes wrong after this change is released?
Are there any special considerations for merging or releasing this change?
Merge / deployment checklist