| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The expected-count assertion can report success when fewer CodeQL versions are cached than requested.
1 open issue 2 files not reviewedConsolidates toolcache PR checks into a shared TypeScript utility using locked workspace dependencies.
Changes:
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| pr-checks/toolcache.ts | Adds shared toolcache commands. |
| pr-checks/package.json | Declares the tool-cache dependency. |
| pr-checks/checks/bundle-toolcache.yml | Uses the utility to clear and verify the cache. |
| pr-checks/checks/bundle-from-toolcache.yml | Uses the utility to verify cached installations. |
| package-lock.json | Records the workspace dependency. |
Review effort: Max
Sorry, something went wrong.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
This allows the script to be shared between the two workflows and ensures that we don't have a floating npm install step in these workflows.
Risk assessment
For internal use only. Please select the risk level of this change:
Which use cases does this change impact?
Environments:
How did/will you validate this change?
If something goes wrong after this change is released, what are the mitigation and rollback strategies?
How will you know if something goes wrong after this change is released?
Are there any special considerations for merging or releasing this change?
Merge / deployment checklist