FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

Status reporting: fix codeql_version field name by cklin · Pull Request #992 · github/codeql-action · GitHub

Status reporting: fix codeql_version field name - #992

Merged
cklin merged 1 commit into
github:mainfrom
cklin:fix-codeql-version-field
Mar 23, 2022
Merged

Status reporting: fix codeql_version field name#992
cklin merged 1 commit into
github:mainfrom
cklin:fix-codeql-version-field

Conversation

cklin commented Mar 23, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR fixes the StatusReportBase field name for CodeQL CLI version. It should be codeql_version instead of codeql_cli_version.

Merge / deployment checklist

  • Confirm this change is backwards compatible with existing workflows.
  • Confirm the readme has been updated if necessary.
  • Confirm the changelog has been updated if necessary.

cklin marked this pull request as ready for review March 23, 2022 18:35
cklin requested a review from a team as a code owner March 23, 2022 18:35

adityasharad left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

Have we got PR checks that would catch incorrect fields by failing the status reporting?

cklin commented Mar 23, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Have we got PR checks that would catch incorrect fields by failing the status reporting?

I am not sure if there is a way to do that. I think the status reporting API endpoint is specifically configured to accept unknown fields, which is generally a good thing. That does make it hard to catch field name errors—I found this one only because I was digging into the status report data and noticing that the CodeQL CLI version is always empty.

cklin merged commit c9973ef into github:main Mar 23, 2022
cklin deleted the fix-codeql-version-field branch March 23, 2022 20:11
This was referenced Mar 30, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL